Academic year
2019/2020
Teachers
Esa Díaz León and Manuel Gustavo Isaac
Department
Department of Philosophy
University
Universitat de Barcelona
Itinerary
Master courses
Module
Module 2. Research Methods in Analytic Philosophy
Code
570626
Credits
5
Language
English
Dates
2019-10-02 - 2019-11-13
Schedule
Wednesdays: 16:00 -19:00. Aditionally: 23-24/01/20
Location
407 - Facultat de Filosofia UB

Description

This course will provide an introduction to the methods, tools and skills that are necessary to engage in discussions in contemporary analytic philosophy.

 

 


Methodology

The course will be divided in three parts. In the first part (5 sessions, during October-early November), we will have a reading group where we will discuss recent papers on methodological issues in philosophy, and students will have to prepare questions and comments in advance. All students should email a substantive question or comment for discussion to both instructors the day before each session. In the second part (to be conducted online, during November-December), students will have to participate in a philosophy blog, run by the instructors specifically for this class (http://researchmethodsaphil.blogspot.com.es). Each student has to write at least 1 standing blog post, and at least 2 comments on two other blog posts. In the third part (to be held on January 23–24, 2020), we will have a small workshop, where each student will have to present a short paper and also comment on someone else’s presentation. Each student will have to send their paper to their commentator at least 3 weeks in advance, and the commentator should send their comments to the author at least 1 week prior to the presentation. The presentation should be about 20 minutes long (+ 10 min. for Q&A).


Evaluation

The final grade for the course will be obtained on the basis of the blog post and comments (30%), workshop presentation (30%), paper commentary (20%), and class participation (including questions by email and in-class questions) (20%).

Topics for blog posts and workshop presentations: Each student can choose a topic based on their own coursework or research interests. The material for the blog post and the workshop presentation should not overlap. It is strongly recommended that students consult with the instructors in advance regarding the topics.

 

Intended Learning Outcomes:

Basic Competences:

CB8: Students should be able to integrate information and form complex judgements on the basis of limited or partial information, including reflections on the ethical and social implications related to their area of research in analytic philosophy.

CB9: Students should be able to communicate effectively their arguments and conclusions to a specialized audience in a clear and rigorous manner.

CB10: Students should be able to acquire learning skills that allow them to pursue their studies in an autonomous manner.

 

General Competences:

CG1: Students should be able to analyze, assess and construct valid arguments, and to identify formal and informal fallacies.

CG2: Students should be able to design, create and develop original research projects in their chosen areas of study in analytic philosophy.

CG4: Students should be able to work both autonomously and as part of a team, in order to provide arguments for and against different positions in analytic philosophy, and provide examples.

 

Specific Competences:

CE1: Students should be able to critically engage with the concepts and methods of contemporary analytic philosophy.

CE4. Students should be able to assess the writings of leading contemporary philosophers in the field of analytic philosophy.

CE5. Students should be able to identify and critically engage with the current state of a particular philosophical debate, and form a reasoned view, even if provisional, about it.

CE7. Students should be able to critically use specialized terminology in the field of analytic philosophy.


Bibliography

October 2: Introduction (no assigned readings)

 

October 9: Schroeter, Laura (2004). “The Limits of Conceptual Analysis”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4): 425–453.

 

October 16Alexander, Joshua and Weinberg, Jonathan M. (2007). “Analytic epistemology and experimental philosophy”. Philosophy Compass 2 (1): 56-80.

 

October 30: Thomasson, Amie (forthcoming). “A Pragmatic Method for Conceptual Ethics”. In: Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Ed. by Herman Cappelen, David Plunkett, and Alexis Burgess. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

November 6: Dutilh Novaes, Catarina (2016). “Conceptual genealogy for analytic philosophy”. In: Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century. Ed. by Jeffrey A. Bell, Andrew Cutrofello, and Paul M. Livingston. New York: Routledge, 74–108.

 

November 13: Machery, Édouard (2017). “Conceptual analysis rebooted”. In: Philosophy within its Proper Bounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chap. 7, 208–244.