|
Fernanda Ferreira
Department of
Psychology. University of Edinburgh
Date and Place
Dijous 18 Octubre a
les 12h
Facultat de
Psicología. Dep.t. Psicologia Bāsica
Abstract
Parsing Plurals
The sentence/ After John and Mary left the team was not the same/ is a
garden-path sentence. Most people initially interpret the NP /the team
/as the object of /left/, and that analysis must be revised when the
verb /was/ is encountered. Ferreira and McClure (1997) reported that
this garden-path effect does not occur if the subordinate clause
contains a conjoined subject and a reciprocal verb, as in /While John
and Mary kissed the photographer took pictures/. But what is the
relevant property of that conjoined subject? We investigated this
question in three experiments in which participants' eye movements were
monitored as they read garden-path sentences, appropriate controls, and
a variety of filler items. In Experiment 1 we found that ordinary plural
NPs such as /the lovers/ failed to block the garden-path effect, whereas
the conjoined phrase did. Experiment 2 compared /two/-phrases (/the two
lovers) /and conjoined NPs, but only the latter were effective in
blocking the garden-path. In the third experiment, a conjoined NP was
specified in a discourse, and then a pronoun such as /they/ or the
phrase /the two/ served as the subject of the reciprocal verb and took
the conjoined NP as its antecedent. This manipulation blocked the garden-path
effect as effectively as a conjoined NP in the garden-path sentence
itself. We conclude that conjoined NPs are uniquely effective at
creating an 'atomic' representation, which is necessary for the
reciprocal feature on the reciprocal verb to be activated quickly enough
to block the garden-path effect. |