|
Contact
salvador.soto@icrea.es
Departament
Departament de Psicología Bŕsica
Universitat de Barcelona
Language
English
Brief description
This course addresses the cognitive and neural processes involved in
synthesizing the information coming from different sensory modalities
during perception. Several domains of perception (from spatial
localization to spoken language) and levels of analyses (from behaviour to
single neuron) are included.
Outline
The course will be organized around the following subjects
1. Introduction and organizational issues
2. Multisensory integration revealed in the spatial domain
3. Multisensory interactions in the domain of time
4. How do they do it? Mechanisms and models of multisensory integration
5. Hearing lips and seeing sounds: Speech as a multisensory phenomenon.
6. Can I borrow this piece of brain? Development and plasticity of
multisensory interactions
7. Where is my hand? Constructing the body schema
8. Attention in a multisensory world
Methodology
Class dynamics. Each class will focus on a given subject, and will consist
of a combination of group discussion on the bibliography papers, and
student presentations on a related issue (specific readings will be
recommended).
Evaluation
The final grade will be determined by
Mandatory: Participation in the class discussions and class presentation.
Optional: Essay / participation in research project
Materials
|
Subject
|
Materials
(*=available in pdf) |
|
Introduction and organizational issues |
Basic Bibliography
|
* Stein, B. E. & Meredith, M. A. (1993).
The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Introduction (p. ix-xv); Chapter 1 (p. 1-19); Chapter 2 (20-37).
* Shimojo, S. & Shams, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not
separate modalities: plasticity and interactions. Current Biology,
11: 505-509 |
|
Multisensory integration revealed in the spatial domain
|
Basic Bibliography |
Bertelson, P. (1998). Starting from the ventriloquist: The
perception of multimodal events. In M. Sabourin, F. I. M. Craik, &
M. Robert (Eds.), Advances in Psychological Science, Vol. 2:
Biological and Cognitive Aspects, (pp. 419-439). Hove, England:
Psychology Press/Erlbaum. |
|
Further readings
On the determinants of ventriloquists illusion and on how to
measure it. |
Welch, R. B. (1999). Meaning, attention, and the “unity assuption”
in the intersensory bias of spatial andd temporal perceptions. In G.
Ashersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive
contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp.
371-383). Elsevier Science, B.V.: Amsterdam.
* Recanzone, G. H. (1998). Rapidly induced auditory plasticity: The
ventriloquism after-effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Science, 95, 869-875.
* De Gelder, B. & Bertelson, P. (2003). Multisensory integration,
perception and ecological validity TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences
Vol.7 No.10, 460- |
|
Multisensory interactions in the domain of time
|
Basic Bibliography |
* King, A. (2005). Multisensory Integration: Strategies for
Synchronization. Current Biology, 15(9), 339-341 |
|
Further Readings:
Basic demonstrations of cross-modal temporal effects |
*
Morein-Zamir, S., Soto-Faraco, S. & Kingstone, A. (2003). Auditory
capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. Cognitive
Brain Research, 17(1):154-63.
*
Fujisaki W, Shimojo S, Kashino M, Nishida S. (2004). Recalibration
of audiovisual simultaneity. Nat Neurosci, 7(7):773-8.
*
Vroomen J, Keetels M, de Gelder B, Bertelson P. (2004).
Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to
audio-visual asynchrony. Cogn Brain Res., 22(1):32-5.
*
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., Shimojo, S. (2000). What you see is what
you hear. Nature, 406: 788 |
|
Discussion about limitations based on neural correlates |
* McDonald, JJ, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Di Russo F, Hillyard SA. (2005).
Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order
perception. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1197-202 |
|
How do they do it? Mechanisms and models of multisensory integration
|
Basic Bibliography |
*
Stein, B. E. (1998). Neural mechanisms for synthesizing sensory
information and producing adaptive behaviors.
J. Exp. Brain Res.,
123, 124-135.
*
Ernst. M. O. & Bulthoff, H. H. (2004).
Merging the senses into a robust percept TRENDS in Cognitive
Sciences, 8(4), 162-169 |
|
Further Readings:
Extrapolating super-additivity from the cell to the organism and
limitations of the super-additivity hypothesis |
* Calvert, G. A. (2001). Crossmodal Processing in the Human Brain:
Insights from Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Cerebral Cortex,
11(12): 1110-1123
* Murray MM, Molholm S, Michel CM, Heslenfeld DJ, Ritter W, Javitt
DC, Schroeder CE, Foxe JJ. (2004). Grabbing Your Ear: Rapid
Auditory-Somatosensory Multisensory Interactions in Low-level
Sensory Cortices Are Not Constrained by Stimulus Alignment. Cereb
Cortex. 2004 Nov 15; [Epub ahead of print]
* Holmes, NP & Spence, C. (2005). Space, Time and Superaditivity.
Curr Biol. 15(18), 762-764 |
|
Feedforward vs. feedback mechanisms |
*
Driver, J. and Spence, C. (2000). Multisensory perception: Beyond
modularity and convergence in crossmodal integration. Current
biology, 10, R731-R735.
* Foxe, JJ. & Schroeder, CE (2005). The case for feedforward
multisensory convergence during early cortical processing.
Neuroreport 16(5):419-423 |
|
Extension of the optimal integration model |
* Alais, D. & Burr, D. (2004). The Ventriloquist Effect Results from
Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration. Current Biology, Vol. 14, 257–262,
February 3, 2004, |
|
Hearing lips and seeing sounds: Speech as a multisensory phenomenon
|
Bibliography |
* Massaro, D. W. & Stork, D. G. (1998). Speech recognition and
sensory integration. American Scientist
* Rizzolatti, G. & Arbib, M. (1998). Language within our grasp.
Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188-194 |
|
Further Readings:
Basic demonstrations and brief definitions |
* Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech
intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 26, 212-215.
* McGurk, H. & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing speech.
Nature, 264, 746-748.
* Campbell, R. (in press; 2004). Audiovisual speech processing. The
Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edition) Keith Brown
(Ed.). Oxford, Elsevier |
|
Neural substrate for the integration of speech
|
* Colin, C. (2002). Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk–MacDonald
effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory. Clinical
Neurophysiology, 113, 495–506
* Calvert, G. A., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Campbell, R.,
Williams, C. R., McGuire, P.K., Woodruff, P. W. R., Iversen S. D., &
David, A. S. (1997). Activation of auditory cortex during silent
lipreading. Science, 276, 593-596.
* van Wassenhove, V. Grant, KW & Poeppel, D. (2005).
Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech,
PNAS, 102;1181-1186 |
|
Mirror neurons, animal calls, and the origins of language |
*
Ghazanfar AA, Logothetis NK.
(2003). Neuroperception: facial expressions linked to monkey calls.
Nature. 423(6943): 937-938
* MELTZOFF, AN & MOORE, MK (1977). Imitation of Facial and Manual
Gestures by Human Neonates, Science, Vol. 198. no. 4312, pp. 75 – 78
*
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G. & Rizzolatti, G. (2002).
Speech listening speciĆcally modulates the excitability of tongue
muscles: a TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 15, pp.
399-402 |
|
Can I borrow this piece of brain? Development and plasticity of
multisensory interactions |
Basic Bibliography
(one of the two references) |
* King, A. (2004). Development of multisensory spatial integration
(pp 1-24), In C. Spence & J. Driver (Eds.) Crossmodal space and
crossmodal attention. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
* Lickliter, R. & Bahrick, L. E. (2004).
Perceptual development and the origins of multisensory
responsiveness. The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. MIT
Press (pp. 643-654)
|
|
Further Readings
Cross-modal integration in infancy |
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1982).
The bimodal perception of speech in infancy.
Science,
218, 1138-41. |
|
Cross-modal plasticity in the sensory deprived |
*
Cohen LG, et al. (1997). Functional relevance of cross-modal
plasticity in blind humans. Nature, 389(6647):180-183.
* Bavelier, D. & Neville, H. (2002). Cross-modal plasticity: Where
and How. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 3, 443-452 |
|
Synesthesia |
*
Grossenbacher, P. G., and Lovelace, C. T., 2001. Mechanisms of
synesthesia: cognitive and physiological constraints, Trends in
Cognitive Sciences,
5:
36- 41.
*
Dixon, M. J., Smilek, D., Cudahy, C., & Merikle, P. M. (2000). Five
plus two equals yellow, Nature, 406: 365. |
|
Where is my hand? Constructing the body schema
|
Basic Bibliography |
*
Maravita, A., Spence, C. & Driver, J. (2003). Multisensory
Integration and the Body Schema: Close to Hand and Within Reach.
Current Biology, 13, R531–R539, |
|
Readings
Localizing tactile events in the body |
* Yamamoto, S. & Kitazawa, S. (2001). Reversal of subjective
temporal order due to arm crossing. Nature Neurosci., 4(7), 759-765
* Kitazawa, S. (2002). Where conscious sensation takes place.
Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 475-477.
Libet B, Alberts WW, Wright EW Jr, Feinstein B. (1967).
Responses of human somatosensory cortex to stimuli below threshold
for conscious sensation. Science. 1967;158(808):1597-1600. [-] |
|
Out of the body experiences and phantom limbs |
*
Graziano MS. (1999). Where is my arm? The relative role of vision
and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96:10418-21.
*
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that
eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
*
Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J. (2000). Visual capture of touch:
out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological
Science, 11, 353-9.
*
Blanke O, Ortigue, S, Landis, T, Seeck, M. (2002). Stimulating
illusory own-body perceptions. Nature., 419, 269-70.
|
|
Breakdown of body representation
|
* Wolpert, DN, Goodbody, SM & Husain, M. (1998). Maintaining
internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal
lobe. NatNeuro, 1(6), 529-533
* Rapp, B. Hendel, SK & Medina, J. (2002) Remodeling of
somotasensory hand representations following cerebral lesions in
humans. Neuroreport, 13(2), 207-211 |
|
Extending the body schema with tools |
*
Iriki, A., Tanaka, M. and Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified
body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones.
Neuroreport 7, 2325–2330.
*
Maravita, A. & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema).
Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, 8, 79-86 |
|
Attention in a multisensory world
|
Basic Bibliography |
*
Driver, J., & Spence, C. (1998). Attention and the crossmodal
construction of space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 254-262. |
|
Readings
Electrophysiological correlates |
Eimer, M. (2004). Electrophysiology of human crossmodal spatial
attention (pp 221-245) In C. Spence & J. Driver (Eds.) Crossmodal
space and crossmodal attention. Oxford, England: Oxford University
Press.
* Talsma, D. & Woldorf, MG (2005). JoCN, 17(7):1098-114 |
|
Does multisensory integration need attention? |
* Driver, J. (1996). Enhancement of selective attention listening by
illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature,
381, 66-68.
*
Alsius, A. et al.
(2005). Audiovisual Integration of Speech Falters under High
Attention Demands.
Curr.
Biol. |
| |
|
|
|