Projects
Reassessing Scientific Objectivity
1 Jan 2021 / 31 Dec 2025 |Laws, explanation and realism in physical and biomedical sciences
1 Jan 2017 / 30 Jun 2021 |DIAPHORA
1 Jan 2016 / 31 Dec 2019 |Explanation and Representation in the Sciences: Monistic and Pluralistic Accounts
1 Jan 2013 / 31 Dec 2016 |Semantics and Pragmatics of Special Contexts
30 Nov 2005 / 30 Nov 2008 |Representation and explanation in science: structural and pragmatic aspects
30 Nov 2005 / 30 Nov 2007 |Truth in Special Contexts
30 Nov 2002 / 30 Nov 2005 |Meaning, Translation and Context
1 Jan 2010 / 31 Dec 2013 |PERSP – Philosophy of Perspectival Thoughts and Facts
17 Dec 2009 / 15 Dec 2015 |Explanation and Representation: Funtional and Inherentist Approaches
1 Jan 2009 / 31 Dec 2012 |List of Publications
Change, Time and Tense: A Parsimonialist Analysis of the Tensed Logical Space of Persisting Through Time
Submitted
A Non-Causal Account of the Explanatorines og General Relativity
Submitted
A Non-Causalist Account of the Explanatory Autonomy in the Psychological Sciences
Synthese, 204 – 89 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04657-1
Ciència I Pseudociència
Compas d’Amalgama https://doi.org/10.1344/Compas.2024.10.10
Unification, T-Theoreticity, and Testing: The Case of Fitness in Natural Selection
Modeling Nature. Review of Frigg and Nguyen “Modeling Nture: An Opinionated Introduction of Scientific Representation”
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Review of Books
Is It Possible to Empirically Test a Metatheory?
Foundations of Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09938-z
On the Elusive Formalisation of the Risky Condition for Hypothesis Testing
International Studies in Philosophy of Science, July 2022 https://doi-org.sire.ub.edu/10.1080/02698595.2022.2084705
How do network explanations explain? A neo-Hempelian approach to network explanations of the ecology of the microbiome
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13:44, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-023-00549-2
Scientific explanation as ampliative, specialized embedding: New developments
C. Abreu (ed.), Philosophy of Science in the 21st Century: Contributions of Metatheoretical Structuralism, UFSC, Brasil, 112-130.
Laws, Reasons and Replaceability
Crítica 53/158, 3-21
Siete tesis metaestructuralistasralistas
J. Díez (ed.), Exploraciones Pluralistas. Las Filosofías de C. Ulises Moulines, UNAM/Tecnos
Fallacies of Love. A Short Philosophical Guide
Bloomsbury P.
Representational Modeling as Ensemble-Plus-Standig-For. A (Weakly) Pragmatist Account
submitted
Guiding Principles and Special Laws
Theoria (Sweden), vol 88, issue 4, 782-794
Scientific Explanation as Ampliative, Specialized Embedding: The Case of Clasical Genetics
Synthese 200-510, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03983-6
Does Explaining Past Success Require (Enough) Retention? The Case Of Ptolemaic Astronomy
Journal for General Filosofy of Science, July 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-021-09589-9
Modeling as Ensemble-Plus-Standing-For: A Moderate Fictionalist Account
A. Cassini and J. Redmond: Models and Idealizations in Science: Fictional and Artifactual Approaches, Springer
An Ensemble-Plus-Standing-For Account of Scientific Modeling: No (Strong) Need for Abstract Objects
X. Donato, C. Martínez and J. L. Falguera (eds.), Abstract Objects in Scientific Practice, Synthese Lybrary
Recensión de "Las Mentiras de la Ciencia"
Crítica 51/151, pp 117-128
Conceptual Reconstruction and Epistemic Import: Allosteric Mechanistic Explanations As a Unified Theory-Net
Crítica, 49.146, pp 5-36
A (Fatal) Trilemma for Best Theory Realism
European Journal for Philosophy of Science , https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-017-0185-1
Siete tesis metaestructuralistas
in J. Díez (ed.) Exploraciones Pluralistas. Las filosofías de C. Ulises Moulines, UNAM, México 2016
Amore a altri inganni. Tratello filosofico su ragioni e passioni
Indiana, Torino
Del amor y otros engaños. Breve tratado filosófico sobre razones y pasiones
AlfaDecay, Barcelona
Did Ptolemy make novel predictions? Launching geocentrism to the scientific realism debate
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 52, 20-34
Counterfactuals, the Discrimination Problem and the Limit Assumption
International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23/1, 85-110
Are Natural Selection Explanatory Models A Priori?
Biology and Philosophy 30 (6), 887-809
General theories of explanation: buyers beware
Synthese 190/3, 379-396.
Scientific explanation as ampliative, specialized embedding: a neo-Hempelian account
Erkenntnis 79/8, 1413-1443
Models, Theory Structure and Mechanisms in Biochmestry: The Case of Allosterism
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and
Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science, 2017, 63, 1-14
Can we dispense with mimesis in representation? Essay review of R. Frigg and C. Hunter (eds.) Beyond mimesis and convention. Representation in art and science
Metascience 21/1, 105-110
Who Got What Wrong? Fodor and Piattelli on Darwin: Guiding Principles and Explanatory Models in Natural Selection
Erkenntnis 78/5, 1143-1175.
La explicación científica: causalidad, unificación y subsunción teórica
L. E. Hoyos (ed.), Relativismo y racionalidad, UNC 2004, Bogotá, pp. 283-414
Explicación, unificación y subsunción
W. J. González (ed.), Pluralidad de la explicación científica, Ariel, Barcelona 2002, pp. 73-93
Descripción, prescripción e interpretación
C. Solís (ed.), Alta tensión: filosofía, sociología e historia de la ciencia, Paidos, Barcelona 1998, pp. 235-258
Hacia una teoría general de la representación científica
Theoria, 13/1, San Sebastián, pp. 157-178
Watermelonsand RedWatermelons. A Case Against Compositionality?
Theoria, 15/2, San Sebastián, pp 281-285
Rivalry and Comparability. Looking Outside the Theories
G. Ernst and K-G Niebergall (eds.), Philosophie der Wissenschaft- Wissenschaft der Philosophie, Mentis, Berlin 2006, 31-50
Measurement Theory
Geneza, 2002, Kiev, pp. 24-41
A General Representation for Internal Proportional Comparison-combiantorial Systems When the Operation is Not Necessarily Closed
Theoria 14/1, 1999, pp. 157-178
Iniciación a la Lógica
Ariel, Barcelona
Fundamentos de Filosofía de la Ciencia
Ariel, Barcelona
Theories as Nets: Combinatorial Measurement Theory
in P. Humphreys (ed.), Patrick Suppes, Mathematical Philosopher, Kluwer Ac. P., Dordrecht 1994, pp. 275-297.
A Hundred Years of Numbers. An Historical Introduction to Measurement Theory. Part I: The Formation Period
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21, 1, 1997, pp. 167-181.
A Hundred Years of Numbers. An Historical Introduction to Measurement Theory. Part II: Suppes and the Mature Theory
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22, 2, 1997 pp. 237-265.
The Theory-Net of Interval Measurement Theory
in A. Ibarra y T. Mormann (eds.),
Representations of Scientific Rationality, Poznan Studies 61, Rodopi, Amsterdam 1997, pp. 135- 164
Structuralist Analysis of Fundamental Measurement Theories
in W. Balzer, C. U. Moulines and J. Sneed (eds.), Structuralist Knowledge Representations. Paradigmatic Examples,
Poznan Studies 75, Rodopi, Amsterdam 2000, pp. 19-49.
A Program for the Individuation of Scientific Concepts
Synthese 130, 2002, pp. 13-48
Possession Conditions for Scientific Concepts
in C. U. Moulines and K. Niebergall (eds.),
Argument und Analyse, Mentis, Berlin 2002, pp. 83-108.
The Ramsey Sentence and Theoretical Content
in M. J. Frapolli (ed.), Belief, Truth and
Probability. Essays to Mark the Centenary of Frank Plumpton Ramsey's Birth, Continuum, London 2005 pp. 70-103.
Rationality in Normal Science and the Structure of Theories
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38, 2007 pp. 543 -554.
History of Measurement Theory
in Gallez, C., Lorenzano, P., Ortiz, E. y Rheinberger, H (eds.), History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS-UNESCO), Oxford 2009, [electronic edition: http://www.eolss.net]
On Popper's Strong Inductivism
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42, 105-116
