Participation is free, but registration is mandatory. To register, please fill in this Google form by Thursday, May 15th: https://forms.gle/hknjyJwWcoEhhboJA
In the debate on gender-fair language, a conflict emerged between the interests of women and non-binary people. Several feminist groups call for making women visible in order to fight sexist stereotypes (visbility strategy). However, Dembroff and Wodak (2018, 2021) argued that is incompatible with a full fairness towards non-binary people: as they highlight, indeed, using the feminine for women and a further form for non-binary people amounts at lumping all the many non-binary identities in one form, while men and women have a dedicated one each. This, they argue, is unfair and to avoid such unfairness it’s necessary to get rid of masculine and feminine forms altogether (neutrality strategy). Such a proposal, though, is incompatible with making women visible in language through the employment of feminine forms. We are, then, at a double bind and research is needed to address this question and find a solution. On the one hand, the request to make women visible in grammar is grounded in the need, still actual, of using language as a tool to counter sexism and patriarchy. Crucially, challenging stereotypes would benefit not only women but also non-binary people. However, making women visible in language requires using forms that perpetrate a binary representation of genders, which is harmful to non-binary people. Moreover, while gender marking might be a useful tool to counter gender stereotypes, gender is the only social category marked in language: countering other types of stereotypes cannot take advantage of grammatical markers. Yet, it’s not clear we should give up on this useful tool and take advantage of the possibility of using grammatical gender marking to counter gender stereotypes. This workshop aims at reaching an advancement on this topic, thanks to prolific discussion between experts on gender in language. To this end, we plan to adopt a cooperative methodology rather than relying on the classical structure of workshops where each participant presents what they have done already: since here the goal is to produce a theoretical advancement on an open research question, we’ll focus more on new ideas brought about by the workshop than on participants’ previous positions. Instead of talks, then, we’ll employ non-formal education methodologies such as trajectories of knowledge, questioning circle, and case scenarios.
Confirmed invited speakers: