UESD

Unexpected Event during Survey Design

 

 

 

Studies published in 2021
  1. Brugarolas, Pablo and Miller, Luis. 2021. “The Causal Effect of Polls on Turnout Intention: A Local Randomization Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Political Analysis 1-7. doi:10.1017/pan.2020.50
  2. Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J., and José Rama. 2021. “When the US Far-right Sneezes, the European Far-right Catches a Cold. Quasi-experimental of Electoral Contagion from Spain.” OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s6fmj
Studies published in 2020
  1. Belmonte, Alessandro. 2020. “Inter-Ethnic Dynamics in the Wake of Terrorist Attacks: Evidence from the 2015 Baga Massacre.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy  https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0009
  2. Ait Bihi Ouali, Laila. 2020. “Effects of signalling tax evasion on redistribution and voting preferences: Evidence from the Panama Papers”. PLoS ONE 15(3): e0229394
  3. Bridgman, Aengus, Ciobanu, Costin, Erlich, Aaron, Bohonos, Danielle and Ross, Christopher. 2020. “Unveilling: the electoral consequences of an exogenous mid-campaign court ruling”. Journal of Politics, forthcoming
  4. Damien, Bol, Giani, Marco, Blais André and Loewen Peter J. 2020. “The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?”. European Journal of Political Research, forthcoming
  5. Casas, Agustín, Curci, Federico and De Moragas, Antoni-Italo. 2020. “Checks and Balances and Nation Building: The Spanish Constitutional Court and Catalonia”. SIOE Conference: 2020
  6. Nägel, Christof and Lutter, Mark. 2020. “The christmas market attack in Berlin and attitudes toward refugees: a natural experiment with data from the european social survey”. European Journal of Securirty Research: 202)
  7. De Vries, Catherine E., Bakker, Bert N., Bolt, Sarah and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2020. “Crisis Signaling: How Italy’s Coronavirus Lockdown Affected Incumbent Support in Other European Countries” SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606149
  8. Falcó-Gimeno, Albert and Fernandez-Vazquez, Pablo. 2020. “Choices That Matter: Coalition Formation and Parties’ Ideological Reputations.” Political Science Research and Methods 8(2): 285–300
  9. Giani, Marco. 2020. “Fear Without Prejudice in the Shadow of Jihadist Threat.” Comparative Political Studies OnlineFirst:1–20.
  10. Nussio, Enzo. 2020. “Attitudinal and Emotional consequences of islamist terrorism. Evidence form the Berlin attack”. Political Psychology Early View
  11. Mikulaschek, Cristhoph, Pant, Saurabh and Tesfaye, Beza. 2020. “Winning Hearts and Minds in Civil Wars: Governance, Leadership Change, and Support for Violent Groups in Iraq”. American Journal of Political Sciences, Early View
  12. Van Hauawaert, Steven M. and Huber, Robert A. 2020. “In-group solidarity or out-group hostility in response to terrorism in France? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design.” European Journal of Political Research Early View
  13. Müller, Stefan and Kneafsey, Liam. 2020. “Sports Games do not change political opinions in Ireland.”. https://muellerstefan.net/papers/mueller_kneafsey_irrelevance_irrelevant_events.pdf
  14. Schraff, Dominik. 2020. “Political trust during the covid-19 pandemic: rally around the flag or lockdown effects?”. 10.31235/osf.io/pu47c
  15. Wicki, Michael. 2020. “Ambitious mobility policies and public opinion: Doomed to fail?” Phd diss., ETH Zurich
  16. Raskin, Yoav and Sadeh, Tal. 2020. “Doomed to Alienate? How European Integration Feeds Euroscepticism” https://www.peio.me/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/PEIO13_paper_40_1.pdf
Studies published in 2019
  1. Curtice, Travis. 2019. “How Repression A ffects Public Perceptions of Police: Evidence from Uganda” https://traviscurticedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2019/11/how-repression-affects-public-perceptions-of-police.pdf
  2. Ferrín, Mónica, Mancosu, Moreno and Cappiali, Teresa M. “Terrorists attacsk and Europeans’ attitudes towards immigrants: An experimental Approach”. European Journal of Political Research, Early View
  3. Larsen, Eric G., Cutts, David and Goodwin, Matthew J. 2019. “Do terrorist attacks feed populist eurospectic? Evidence from two comparative quasi-experiments”. European Journal of Political Research 59(1):182-205
  4. Kostas, Geminis, Bruinsma, Bastiaan and Germann, Micha. 2019. “The electoral effects of a diplomatic stand-off: Evidence from a natural experiment.” European Consortium of Political Research General Conference 2019
  5. Giani, Marco and Méon Pierre-Guillaume. 2019. “Global Racist Contagion Following Donald Trump’s Election.” British Journal of Political Science, 1-8.
  6. Pamela, Jakiela and Ozier, Owen. 2019. The impact of violence on individual risk preferences: evidence from a natural experiment.. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2019 101:3, 547-559
  7. Kim, Jin W. and Kim, Eunji. 2019. “Identifying the effect of political rumor diffusion using variations in survey timing.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 14: No. 3, pp 293-311.
  8. Merler, Silvia. 2019. “Technocracy, trust and democracy: Evidence os citizens’ attitudes from a natraul experiment in Italy.” Government and Opposition, 1-25
  9. Muñoz, Jordi and Anduiza, Eva. 2019. “‘If a fight starts, watch the crowd’ The effect of violence on popular support for social movements.” Journal of Peace Research forthcoming.
  10. Nussio, Enzo, Bove, Vincenzo and Steele, Bridget. 2019. “The consequences of terrorism on migration attitudes across Europe.”. Political Geography 75:102047
  11. Schwartz, Cassilde, Simon, Miranda, Hudson, David and van-Heerde-Hudson, Jennifer. 2018. “A populist paradox? How Brexit softened anti-immigrant attitudes”. British Journal of Political Science, 1-21.
  12. Solodoch, Omor. 2019. “Regaining control? The political impact of policy responses to refugee crises”. SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753
Studies published in 2018
  1. Balcells, Laia and Torrats-Espinosa, Gerard. 2018. “Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(42):10624–10629.
  2. Boydstun, Amber E., Feezell, Jessica T. and Glazier, Rebecca A. 2018. “In the wake of a terrorist attack, do Americans’ attitudes toward Muslims decline?” Research & Politics 5(4):1–7.
  3. Burlacu, Diana, Immergut, Ellen M., Oskarson, Maria and Rönnerstrand, Björn. 2018. “The politics of credit claiming: Rights and recognition in health policy feedback.” Social Policy & Administration 52(4):880–894.
  4. Depetris-Chauvin, Emilio, Durante, Ruben and Campante, Felipe R. 2018. “Building Nations through shared experiences: Evidence from African football”. American Economic Review https://www.nber.org/papers/w24666.pdf
  5. De Vries, Catherine E. 2018. Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Flores, René D. 2018. “Can Elites Shape Public Attitudes Toward Immigrants?: Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Social Forces 96(4):1649–1690.
  7. Gorman, Brandon and Seguin, Charles. 2018. “World Citizens on the Periphery: Threat and Identification with Global Society”. American Journal of Sociology, 124(3): 705-761
  8. Hanaoka, Chie, Shigeoka, Hitoshi and Watanabe, Yasutora. 2018. “Do risk preferences change? Evidence from the great east japan earthquake”. Applied Economics 10(2)
  9. Larsen, Erik Gahner. 2018. “Welfare Retrenchments and Government Support: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” European Sociological Review 34(1):40–51.
  10. Minkus, Lara, Deutschmann Emanuel and Delhey, Jan. 2018. “A Trump effect on the EU’s popularity? The US presidential election as a natural experiment.” Perspectives on Politics forthcoming:1–18.
  11. Castanho, Bruno. 2018. “The Non-Impact of the 2015 Paris Terrorist Attacks on Political Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44(6):838–850.
  12. Solaz, Hector, De Vries, Catherine E., Roosmarijin, de Geus. 2018. “In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies OnlineFirst:1–31.
  13. Valentim, Vicente. 2018. “Creating critical citizens? Anti-austerity protests and public opinion” SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3292157
Studies published in 2017
  1. Macarena, Ares and Hernández, Enrique. 2017. “The corrosive effect of corruption on trust in politicians: Evidence from a natural experiment.” Research & Politics 4(2):1–8.
  2. Bassi, Vittorio and Rasul, Imran. 2017. “Persuasion: A case study of papal influences on fertility-related beliefs and behaviour”. American Economic Journal of Applied Economics, 4(9): 250-302
  3. Coupe, Tom. 2017. “The impact of terrorism on expectations, trust and happiness – the case of the November 13 attacks in Paris, France.” Applied Economics Letters 24(15):1084–1087.
  4. Geys, Benny and Salmai, Qari. 2017. “Will you still trust me tomorrow? The causal effect of terrorism on social trust.” Public Choice 96(3-4):289–305.
  5. Schaffner, Brian F. and Roche, Cameron. 2017. “Misinformation and motivated reasoning: Responses to economic news in a politicized environment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81(1):86-110
Studies published in 2016
  1. Dinas, Elias, Hartman, Erin and van Spanje, Joost. 2016. “Dead man walking: The affective roots of issue proximity between voters and parties.” Political Behavior 38(3):659–687.
  2. Jensen, Carsten and Naumann, Elias. 2016. “Increasing pressures and support for public health-care in Europe.” Health Policy 120(6):698–705.
  3. Ojeda, Christopher. 2016. “The effect of 9/11 on the heritability of political trust.” Political psychology 37(1):73–88.
  4. Pierce, Laman, Rogers, Todd and Snyder, Jason A. 2016. “Losing Hurts: The Happiness Impact of Partisan Electoral Loss.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 3(1):44–59.
  5. Reeves, Aaron and de Vries, Robert . 2016. “Does media coverage influence public attitudes towards welfare recipients? The impact of the 2011 English riots.” The British Journal of Sociology 67(2):281–306.
Studies published in 2015
  1. Branton, Regina, Martinez-Ebers, Valerie, Carey Jr., Tony E. and Matsubayashi, Tetsuya. 2015. “Social Protest and Policy Attitudes: The Case of the 2006 Immigrant Rallies.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2):390–402.
  2. García-Ponce, Omar and Pasquales, Benjamin. 2015. “How Political Repression Shapes Attitudes.Toward the State: Evidence from Zimbabwe.”. http://omargarciaponce.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GarciaPonce_and_Pasquale_2014.pdf
  3. Hariri, Jacob, Bjørnskov, Christian and Justesen, Mogens K. 2015. “Economic shocks and subjective well-being: Evidence from a quasi-experiment.The World Bank Economic Review 30(1):55–77.
Studies published in 2014
  1. Carey Jr, Tony E., Branton, Regina P. and Martinez-Eber, Valerie. 2014. “The influence of social protests on issue salience among latinos.” Political Research Quarterly 67(3):615–627.
  2. Jakobsson, Niklas and Blom, Svein. 2014. “Did the 2011 Terror Attacks in Norway Change Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Immigrants?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(4):475–486.
Studies published in 2013
  1. Bonilla, Tabitha and Grimmer, Justin. 2013. “Elevated threat levels and decreased expectations: How democracy handles terrorist threats.” Poetics 41(6):650–669.
  2. Thisted, Peter and Meier, Mads. 2013. “The effect of terror on institutional trust: New evidence from the 3/11 Madrid terrorist attack.” Political Psychology 34(6):917–926.
  3. Finseraas, Henning and Listhaug, Ola. 2013. “It can happen here: the impact of the Mumbai terror attacks on public opinion in Western Europe.” Public Choice 156(1-2):213–228.
  4. Legewie, Joscha. 2013. “Terrorist Events and Attitudes toward Immigrants: A Natural Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 118(5):1199–1245.
  5. Silber, Heather M. 2013. “Can protests make Latinos “American”? Identity, immigration politics, and the 2006 marches.” American Politics Research 41(2):298–327.
  6. Zepeda-Millán, Chris and Wallace, Sophia J. 2013. “Racialization in times of contention: How social movements influence Latino racial identity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 1(4):510–527.
Studies published in 2012
  1. Holbrook, Thomas M., Clayton, Clouse and Weinschenk, Aaron C. 2012. “Bringing the president back in: The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the evolution of retrospective voting in the 2008 presidential election.” Political Research Quarterly 65(2):263–274.
Studies published in 2011
  1. Bozzoli, Carlos and Müller, Cathérine. 2011. “Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: Evidence from the UK.” European Journal of Political Economy 27(S1):S89–S106.
  2. Finseraas, Henning, Jakobsson, Niklas and Kotsadam, Andreas. 2011. “Did the murder of Theo van Gogh change Europeans’ immigration policy preferences?” Kyklos 64(3):396–409.
  3. Metcalfe, Robertm Powdthavee, Nattavudh and Dolan, Paul. 2011. “Destruction and distress: Using a quasi-experiment to show the effects of the September 11 attacks on mental wellbeing in the United Kingdom.” The Economic Journal 121(550):F81–F103.
Studies published in 2010
  1. Berger, Eva M. 2010. “The Chernobyl disaster, concern about the environment, and life satisfaction.” Kyklos 63(1):1–8.
  2. Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil and Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia. 2010. “Irrelevant events affect voters’ evaluations of government performence”.
  3. Slothuus, Rune. 2010. “When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment” Political Communication 27(2):158–177.
Studies published before 2010
  1. Das, Enny, Bezemer, Marieke D., Kerkhof, Peter and Vermeulen, Ivar E. 2009. “How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(3):453–459.
  2. Perrin, Andrew J. and Smolek, Sondra J. 2009. “Who trusts? Race, gender, and the September 11 rally effect among young adults.” Social Science Research 38(1):134–145.
  3. Schulz, Peter J., Nakamoto, Kent, Hartung, Uwe and Faustinelli, Carmen. 2008. “The death of Rosmarie Voser: The not-so-harmful consequences of a fatal medical error.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(3):386–397.
  4. Boomgaarden, Hajo G. and de Vreese, Claes H. 2007. “Dramatic Real-world Events and Public Opinion Dynamics: Media Coverage and its Impact on Public Reactions to an Assassination.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19(3):354–366.
  5. Nagoshi, Julie L., Terrell, Heather K. and Nagoshi, Craig T. 2007. “Changes in authoritarianism and coping in college students immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.” Personality and Individual Differences 43(7):1722–1732.
  6. Krosnick, Jon A and Kinder, Donald R. 1990. “Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming.” American Political Science Review 84(2):497–512.
  7. Hofstetter, Richard C. 1969. “Political Disengagement and the Death of Martin Luther King.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 33(2):174–179.
  8. Lever, H. 1969. “The Johannesburg Station Explosion and Ethnic Attitudes.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 33(2):180–189.
  9. Hartnett, Rodney T. and Libby, Carol U. 1968. Agreement with views of Martin Luther King, Jr. Before and after his assassination“. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1968: i-15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accidents, fatalities, disasters and epidemics
  1. Berger, Eva M. 2010. “The Chernobyl disaster, concern about the environment, and life satisfaction.” Kyklos 63(1):1–8.
  2. Pamela, Jakiela and Ozier, Owen. 2019. The impact of violence on individual risk preferences: evidence from a natural experiment.. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2019 101:3, 547-559
  3. Schraff, Dominik. 2020. “Political trust during the covid-19 pandemic: rally around the flag or lockdown effects?”. 10.31235/osf.io/pu47c
  4. Schulz, Peter J., Nakamoto, Kent, Hartung, Uwe and Faustinelli, Carmen. 2008. “The death of Rosmarie Voser: The not-so-harmful consequences of a fatal medical error.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(3):386–397.
  5. Wicki, Michael. 2020. “Ambitious mobility policies and public opinion: Doomed to fail?” Phd diss., ETH Zurich
Corruption
  1. Macarena, Ares and Hernández, Enrique. 2017. “The corrosive effect of corruption on trust in politicians: Evidence from a natural experiment.” Research & Politics 4(2):1–8.
  2. Ait Bihi Ouali, Laila. 2020. “Effects of signalling tax evasion on redistribution and voting preferences: Evidence from the Panama Papers”. PLoS ONE 15(3): e0229394
  3. De Vries, Catherine E. 2018. Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Krosnick, Jon A. and Kinder, Donald R. 1990. “Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming.” American Political Science Review 84(2):497–512.
  5. Solaz, Hector, De Vries, Catherine E., Roosmarijin, de Geus. 2018. “In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies OnlineFirst:1–31.
Economic Schocks
  1. Hariri, Jacob, Bjørnskov, Christian and Justesen, Mogens K. 2015. “Economic shocks and subjective well-being: Evidence from a quasi-experiment.The World Bank Economic Review 30(1):55–77.
  2. Holbrook, Thomas M., Clayton, Clouse and Weinschenk, Aaron C. 2012. “Bringing the president back in: The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the evolution of retrospective voting in the 2008 presidential election.” Political Research Quarterly 65(2):263–274.
  3. Schaffner, Brian F. and Roche, Cameron. 2017. “Misinformation and motivated reasoning: Responses to economic news in a politicized environment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81(1):86-110
Elections Results
  1. Brugarolas, Pablo and Miller, Luis. 2021. “The Causal Effect of Polls on Turnout Intention: A Local Randomization Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Political Analysis 1-7. doi:10.1017/pan.2020.50
  2. Giani, Marco and Méon Pierre-Guillaume. 2019. “Global Racist Contagion Following Donald Trump’s Election.” British Journal of Political Science, 1-8.
  3. Minkus, Lara, Deutschmann Emanuel and Delhey, Jan. 2018. “A Trump effect on the EU’s popularity? The US presidential election as a natural experiment.” Perspectives on Politics forthcoming:1–18.
  4. Pierce, Laman, Rogers, Todd and Snyder, Jason A. 2016. “Losing Hurts: The Happiness Impact of Partisan Electoral Loss.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 3(1):44–59.
  5. Schwartz, Cassilde, Simon, Miranda, Hudson, David and van-Heerde-Hudson, Jennifer. “A populist paradox? How Brexit softened anti-immigrant attitudes”. British Journal of Political Science, 1-21.
  6. Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J., and José Rama. 2021. “When the US Far-right Sneezes, the European Far-right Catches a Cold. Quasi-experimental of Electoral Contagion from Spain.” OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s6fmj
Policies and political and judicial decisions
  1. Damien, Bol, Giani, Marco, Blais André and Loewen Peter J. “The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?”. European Journal of Political Research, forthcoming
  2. Bridgman, Aengus, Ciobanu, Costin, Erlich, Aaron, Bohonos, Danielle and Ross, Christopher. 2020. “Unveilling: the electoral consequences of an exogenous mid-campaign court ruling”. Journal of Politics, forthcoming
  3. Burlacu, Diana, Immergut, Ellen M., Oskarson, Maria and Rönnerstrand, Björn. 2018. “The politics of credit claiming: Rights and recognition in health policy feedback.” Social Policy & Administration 52(4):880–894.
  4. Casas, Agustín, Curci, Federico and De Moragas, Antoni-Italo. 2020. “Checks and Balances and Nation Building: The Spanish Constitutional Court and Catalonia”. SIOE Conference: 2020
  5. De Vries, Catherine E., Bakker, Bert N., Bolt, Sarah and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2020. “Crisis Signaling: How Italy’s Coronavirus Lockdown Affected Incumbent Support in Other European Countries”
  6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606149
  7. Falcó-Gimeno, Albert and Fernandez-Vazquez, Pablo. 2020. “Choices That Matter: Coalition Formation and Parties’ Ideological Reputations.” Political Science Research and Methods 8(2): 285–300
  8. Kostas, Geminis, Bruinsma, Bastiaan and Germann, Micha. 2019. “The electoral effects of a diplomatic stand-off: Evidence from a natural experiment.” European Consortium of Political Research General Conference 2019
  9. Larsen, Erik G. 2018. “Welfare Retrenchments and Government Support: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” European Sociological Review 34(1):40–51.
  10. Merler, Silvia. 2019. “Technocracy, trust and democracy: Evidence os citizens’ attitudes from a natraul experiment in Italy.” Government and Opposition, 1-25
  11. Mikulaschek, Cristhoph, Pant, Saurabh and Tesfaye, Beza. 2020. “Winning Hearts and Minds in Civil Wars: Governance, Leadership Change, and Support for Violent Groups in Iraq”. American Journal of Political Sciences, Early View
  12. Raskin, Yoav and Sadeh, Tal. 2020. “Doomed to Alienate? How European Integration Feeds Euroscepticism” https://www.peio.me/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/PEIO13_paper_40_1.pdf
  13. Slothuus, Rune. 2010. “When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment” Political Communication 27(2):158–177.
  14. Solodoch, Omor. 2019. “Regaining control? The political impact of policy responses to refugee crises”. SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753
Protests and Repression
  1. Branton, Regina, Martinez-Ebers, Valerie, Carey Jr., Tony E. and Matsubayashi, Tetsuya. 2015. “Social Protest and Policy Attitudes: The Case of the 2006 Immigrant Rallies.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2):390–402.
  2. Carey Jr, er al. 2014. “The influence of social protests on issue salience among latinos.” Political Research Quarterly 67(3):615–627.
  3. Curtice, Travis. 2019. “How Repression A ffects Public Perceptions of Police: Evidence from Uganda” https://traviscurticedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2019/11/how-repression-affects-public-perceptions-of-police.pdf
  4. García-Ponce, Omar and Pasquale, Benjamin. 2015. “How Political Repression Shapes Attitudes.Toward the State: Evidence from Zimbabwe.”. http://omargarciaponce.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GarciaPonce_and_Pasquale_2014.pdf
  5. Muñoz, Jordi and Anduiza, Eva. 2019. “‘If a fight starts, watch the crowd’ The effect of violence on popular support for social movements.” Journal of Peace Research forthcoming.
  6. Reeves, Aaron and de Vries, Robert. 2016. “Does media coverage influence public attitudes towards welfare recipients? The impact of the 2011 English riots.” The British Journal of Sociology 67(2):281–306.
  7. Silber, Heather M. 2013. “Can protests make Latinos “American”? Identity, immigration politics, and the 2006 marches.” American Politics Research 41(2):298–327.
  8. Valentim, Vicente. 2018. “Creating critical citizens? Anti-austerity protests and public opinion” SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3292157
  9. Zepeda-Millán, Chris and Wallace,Sophia J. 2013. “Racialization in times of contention: How social movements influence Latino racial identity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 1(4):510–527.
Sports
  1. Depetris-Chauvin, Emilio, Durante, Ruben and Campante, Felipe R. 2018. “Building Nations through shared experiences: Evidence from African football”. American Economic Review https://www.nber.org/papers/w24666.pdf
  2. Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil and Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia. 2010. “Irrelevant events affect voters’ evaluations of government performence”.
  3. Müller, Stefan and Kneafsey, Liam. 2020. “Sports Games do not change political opinions in Ireland.”. https://muellerstefan.net/papers/mueller_kneafsey_irrelevance_irrelevant_events.pdf
Statement and Rumors
  1. Bassi, Vittorio and Rasul, Imran. 2017. “Persuasion: A case study of papal influences on fertility-related beliefs and behaviour”. American Economic Journal of Applied Economics, 4(9): 250-302
  2. Flores, René D. 2018. “Can Elites Shape Public Attitudes Toward Immigrants?: Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Social Forces 96(4):1649–1690.
  3. Kim, Jin W. and Kim, Eunji. 2019. “Identifying the effect of political rumor diffusion using variations in survey timing.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 14: No. 3, pp 293-311.
Terrorism
  1. Balcells, Laia and Torrats-Espinosa, Gerad. 2018. “Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(42):10624–10629.
  2. Belmonte, Alessandro. 2020. “Inter-Ethnic Dynamics in the Wake of Terrorist Attacks: Evidence from the 2015 Baga Massacre.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy  https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0009
  3. Boomgaarden, Hajo G. and de Vreese, Claes H. . 2007. “Dramatic Real-world Events and Public Opinion Dynamics: Media Coverage and its Impact on Public Reactions to an Assassination.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19(3):354–366.
  4. Bonilla, Tabitha and Grimmer, Justin. 2013. “Elevated threat levels and decreased expectations: How democracy handles terrorist threats.” Poetics 41(6):650–669.
  5. Boydstun, Amber E., Feezell, Jessica T. and Glazier, Rebecca A. 2018. “In the wake of a terrorist attack, do Americans’ attitudes toward Muslims decline?” Research & Politics 5(4):1–7.
  6. Bozzoli, Carlos and Müller, Cathérine. 2011. “Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: Evidence from the UK.” European Journal of Political Economy 27(S1):S89–S106.
  7. Nägel, Christof and Lutter, Mark. 2020. “The christmas market attack in Berlin and attitudes toward refugees: a natural experiment with data from the european social survey”. European Journal of Security Research: 202)
  8. Coupe, Tom. 2017. “The impact of terrorism on expectations, trust and happiness – the case of the November 13 attacks in Paris, France.” Applied Economics Letters 24(15):1084–1087.
  9. Das, Enny, Bezemer, Marieke D., Kerkhof, Peter and Vermeulen, Ivar E. 2009. “How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(3):453–459.
  10. Dinas, Elias, Hartman, Erin and van Spanje, Joost. 2016. “Dead man walking: The affective roots of issue proximity between voters and parties.” Political Behavior 38(3):659–687.
  11. Dinesen, Peter and Meier, Mads. 2013. “The effect of terror on institutional trust: New evidence from the 3/11 Madrid terrorist attack.” Political Psychology 34(6):917–926.
  12. Ferrín, Mónica, Mancosu, Moreno and Cappiali, Teresa M. 2019. “Terrorists attacsk and Europeans’ attitudes towards immigrants: An experimental Approach”. European Journal of Political Research, Early View
  13. Finseraas, Henning and Listhaug, Ola. 2013. “It can happen here: the impact of the Mumbai terror attacks on public opinion in Western Europe.” Public Choice 156(1-2):213–228.
  14. Finseraas, Henning, Jakobsson, Niklas and Kotsadam, Andreas. 2011. “Did the murder of Theo van Gogh change Europeans’ immigration policy preferences?” Kyklos 64(3):396–409.
  15. Larsen, Eric G., Cutts, David and Goodwin, Matthew J. 2019. “Do terrorist attacks feed populist eurospectic? Evidence from two comparative quasi-experiments”. European Journal of Political Research 59(1):182-205
  16. Geys, Benny and Qari, Salmai. 2017. “Will you still trust me tomorrow? The causal effect of terrorism on social trust.” Public Choice 96(3-4):289–305.
  17. Giani, Marco. 2020. “Fear Without Prejudice in the Shadow of Jihadist Threat.” Comparative Political Studies OnlineFirst:1–20.
  18. Gorman, Brandon and Seguin Chales. 2018. “World Citizens on the Periphery: Threat and Identification with Global Society”. American Journal of Sociology, 124(3): 705-761
  19. Hartnett, Rodney T. and Libby, Carol U. 1968. Agreement with views of Martin Luther King, Jr. Before and after his assassination“. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1968: i-15
  20. Hofstetter, C. Richard. 1969. “Political Disengagement and the Death of Martin Luther King.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 33(2):174–179.
  21. Jakobsson, Niklas and Blom, Svein. 2014. “Did the 2011 Terror Attacks in Norway Change Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Immigrants?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(4):475–486.
  22. Legewie, Joscha. 2013. “Terrorist Events and Attitudes toward Immigrants: A Natural Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 118(5):1199–1245.
  23. Lever, H. 1969. “The Johannesburg Station Explosion and Ethnic Attitudes.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 33(2):180–189.
  24. Metcalfe, Robertm Powdthavee, Nattavudh and Dolan, Paul. 2011. “Destruction and distress: Using a quasi-experiment to show the effects of the September 11 attacks on mental wellbeing in the United Kingdom.” The Economic Journal 121(550):F81–F103.
  25. Van Hauawaert, Steven M. and Huber, Robert A. 2020. “In-group solidarity or out-group hostility in response to terrorism in France? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design.” European Journal of Political Research Early View
  26. Nagoshi, Julie L., Terrell, Heather K. and Nagoshi, Craig T. 2007. “Changes in authoritarianism and coping in college students immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.” Personality and Individual Differences 43(7):1722–1732.
  27. Nussio, Enzo, Bove, Vincenzo and Steele, Bridget. 2019. “The consequences of terrorism on migration attitudes across Europe.”. Political Geography 75:102047
  28. Nussio Enzo. 2020. “Attitudinal and Emotional consequences of islamist terrorism. Evidence form the Berlin attack”. Political Psychology Early View
  29. Ojeda, Christopher. 2016. “The effect of 9/11 on the heritability of political trust.” Political psychology 37(1):73–88.
  30. Perrin, Andrew J. and Smolek, Sondra J. 2009. “Who trusts? Race, gender, and the September 11 rally effect among young adults.” Social Science Research 38(1):134–145.
  31. Castanho, Bruno. 2018. “The Non-Impact of the 2015 Paris Terrorist Attacks on Political Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44(6):838–850.
Others
  1. Carsten, Jensen and Naumann, Elias. 2016. “Increasing pressures and support for public health-care in Europe.” Health Policy 120(6):698–705.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups
  1. Belmonte, Alessandro. .2020. “Inter-Ethnic Dynamics in the Wake of Terrorist Attacks: Evidence from the 2015 Baga Massacre.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy  https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0009
  2. Boomgaarden, Hajo G. and de Vreese,Claes H. 2007. “Dramatic Real-world Events and Public Opinion Dynamics: Media Coverage and its Impact on Public Reactions to an Assassination.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19(3):354–366.
  3. Boydstun, Amber E., Feezell, Jessica T. and Glazier, Rebecca A. 2018. “In the wake of a terrorist attack, do Americans’ attitudes toward Muslims decline?” Research & Politics 5(4):1–7.
  4. Branton, Regina, Martinez-Ebers, Valerie, Carey Jr., Tony E. and Matsubayashi, Tetsuya. 2015. “Social Protest and Policy Attitudes: The Case of the 2006 Immigrant Rallies.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2):390–402.
  5. Carey Jr, Tony E., Branton, Regina P. and Martinez-Eber, Valerie. 2014. “The influence of social protests on issue salience among latinos.” Political Research Quarterly 67(3):615–627.
  6. Nägel, Christof and Lutter, Mark. 2020. “The christmas market attack in Berlin and attitudes toward refugees: a natural experiment with data from the european social survey”. European Journal of Securirty Research: 202)
  7. Das, Enny, Bezemer, Marieke D., Kerkhof, Peter and Vermeulen, Ivar E. 2009. “How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(3):453–459.
  8. Depetris-Chauvin, Emilio, Durante, Ruben and Campante, Felipe R. 2018. “Building Nations through shared experiences: Evidence from African football”. American Economic Review https://www.nber.org/papers/w24666.pdf
  9. Ferrín, Mónica, Mancosu, Moreno and Cappiali, Teresa M. 2019. “Terrorists attacsk and Europeans’ attitudes towards immigrants: An experimental Approach”. European Journal of Political Research, Early View
  10. Finseraas, Henning, Jakobsson, Niklas and Kotsadam, Andreas. 2011. “Did the murder of Theo van Gogh change Europeans’ immigration policy preferences?” Kyklos 64(3):396–409.
  11. Flores, René D. 2018. “Can Elites Shape Public Attitudes Toward Immigrants?: Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Social Forces 96(4):1649–1690.
  12. Larsen, Eric G., Cutts, David and Goodwin, Matthew J. 2019. “Do terrorist attacks feed populist eurospectic? Evidence from two comparative quasi-experiments”. European Journal of Political Research 59(1):182-205
  13. Giani, Marco and Méon, Pierre-Guillaume. 2019. “Global Racist Contagion Following Donald Trump’s Election.” British Journal of Political Science, 1-8.
  14. Giani, Marco. 2020. “Fear Without Prejudice in the Shadow of Jihadist Threat.” Comparative Political Studies OnlineFirst:1–20.
  15. Jakobsson, Niklas and Blom, Svein. 2014. “Did the 2011 Terror Attacks in Norway Change Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Immigrants?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(4):475–486.
  16. Legewie, Joscha. 2013. “Terrorist Events and Attitudes toward Immigrants: A Natural Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 118(5):1199–1245.
  17. Lever, H. 1969. “The Johannesburg Station Explosion and Ethnic Attitudes.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 33(2):180–189.
  18. Van Hauawaert, Steven M. and Huber, Robert A. 2020. “In-group solidarity or out-group hostility in response to terrorism in France? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design.” European Journal of Political Research Early View
  19. Nussio, Enzo, Bove, Vincenzo and Steele, Bridget. 2019. “The consequences of terrorism on migration attitudes across Europe.”. Political Geography 75:102047
  20. Nussio, Enzo. 2020. “Attitudinal and Emotional consequences of islamist terrorism. Evidence form the Berlin attack”. Political Psychology Early View
  21. Reeves, Aaron and de Vries, Robert. 2016. “Does media coverage influence public attitudes towards welfare recipients? The impact of the 2011 English riots.” The British Journal of Sociology 67(2):281–306.
  22. Schwartz, Cassilde, Simon, Miranda, Hudson, David and van-Heerde-Hudson, Jennifer. 2018. “A populist paradox? How Brexit softened anti-immigrant attitudes”. British Journal of Political Science, 1-21.
  23. Silber, Heather M. 2013. “Can protests make Latinos “American”? Identity, immigration politics, and the 2006 marches.” American Politics Research 41(2):298–327.
  24. Castanho, Bruno. 2018. “The Non-Impact of the 2015 Paris Terrorist Attacks on Political Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44(6):838–850.
  25. Solodoch, Omor. 2019. “Regaining control? The political impact of policy responses to refugee crises”. SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753
  26. Zepeda-Millán, Chris and Wallace Sophia J. 2013. “Racialization in times of contention: How social movements influence Latino racial identity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 1(4):510–527.
Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties
  1. Macarena, Ares and Hernández, Enrique. 2017. “The corrosive effect of corruption on trust in politicians: Evidence from a natural experiment.” Research & Politics 4(2):1–8.
  2. Balcells, Laia and Torrats-Espinosa, Gerard. 2018. “Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(42):10624–10629.
  3. Ait Bihi Ouali, Laila. 2020. “Effects of signalling tax evasion on redistribution and voting preferences: Evidence from the Panama Papers”. PLoS ONE 15(3): e0229394
  4. Damien, Bol, Giani, Marco, Blais André and Loewen Peter J. “The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?”. European Journal of Political Research, forthcoming
  5. Bridgman, Aengus, Ciobanu, Costin, Erlich, Aaron, Bohonos, Danielle and Ross, Christopher. 2020. “Unveilling: the electoral consequences of an exogenous mid-campaign court ruling”. Journal of Politics, forthcoming
  6. Brugarolas, Pablo and Miller, Luis. 2021. “The Causal Effect of Polls on Turnout Intention: A Local Randomization Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Political Analysis 1-7. doi:10.1017/pan.2020.50
  7. Burlacu, Diana, Immergut, Ellen M., Oskarson, Maria and Rönnerstrand, Björn. 2018. “The politics of credit claiming: Rights and recognition in health policy feedback.” Social Policy & Administration 52(4):880–894.
  8. Casas, Agustín, Curci, Federico and De Moragas, Antoni-Italo. 2020. “Checks and Balances and Nation Building: The Spanish Constitutional Court and Catalonia”. SIOE Conference: 2020
  9. Coupe, Tom. 2017. “The impact of terrorism on expectations, trust and happiness – the case of the November 13 attacks in Paris, France.” Applied Economics Letters 24(15):1084–1087.
  10. Curtice, Travis. 2019. “How Repression Aff ects Public Perceptions of Police: Evidence from Uganda” https://traviscurticedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2019/11/how-repression-affects-public-perceptions-of-police.pdf
  11. De Vries, Catherine E. 2018. Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. De Vries, Catherine E., Bakker, Bert N., Bolt, Sarah and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2020. “Crisis Signaling: How Italy’s Coronavirus Lockdown Affected Incumbent Support in Other European Countries” SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606149
  13. Dinas, Elias, Hartman, Erin and van Spanje, Joost. 2016. “Dead man walking: The affective roots of issue proximity between voters and parties.” Political Behavior 38(3):659–687.
  14. Dinesen, Peter and Meier, Mads. 2013. “The effect of terror on institutional trust: New evidence from the 3/11 Madrid terrorist attack.” Political Psychology 34(6):917–926.
  15. Falcó-Gimeno, Albert, and Fernandez-Vazquez, Pablo. 2020. “Choices That Matter: Coalition Formation and Parties’ Ideological Reputations.” Political Science Research and Methods 8(2): 285–300
  16. Larsen, Eric G., Cutts, David and Goodwin, Matthew J. 2019. “Do terrorist attacks feed populist eurospectic? Evidence from two comparative quasi-experiments”. European Journal of Political Research 59(1):182-205
  17. García-Ponce, Omar and Pasquale, Benjamin. 2015. “How Political Repression Shapes Attitudes.Toward the State: Evidence from Zimbabwe.”. http://omargarciaponce.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GarciaPonce_and_Pasquale_2014.pdf
  18. Kostas, Geminis, Bruinsma, Bastiaan and Germann, Micha. 2019. “The electoral effects of a diplomatic stand-off: Evidence from a natural experiment.” European Consortium of Political Research General Conference 2019
  19. Hartnett, Robert T. and Libby Carol U. 1968. Agreement with views of Martin Luther King, Jr. Before and after his assassination“. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1968: i-15
  20. Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil and Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia. 2010. “Irrelevant events affect voters’ evaluations of government performence”.
  21. Hofstetter, Richard C. 1969. “Political Disengagement and the Death of Martin Luther King.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 33(2):174–179.
  22. Holbrook, Thomas M., Clayton, Clouse and Weinschenk, Aaron C. 2012. “Bringing the president back in: The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the evolution of retrospective voting in the 2008 presidential election.” Political Research Quarterly 65(2):263–274.
  23. Jensen, Carsten and Naumann, Elias. 2016. “Increasing pressures and support for public health-care in Europe.” Health Policy 120(6):698–705.
  24. Krosnick, Jon A. and Kinder, Donald R. 1990. “Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming.” American Political Science Review 84(2):497–512.
  25. Larsen, Erik G. 2018. “Welfare Retrenchments and Government Support: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” European Sociological Review 34(1):40–51.
  26. Merler, Silvia. 2019. “Technocracy, trust and democracy: Evidence os citizens’ attitudes from a natraul experiment in Italy.” Government and Opposition, 1-25
  27. Mikulaschek, Cristhoph, Pant, Saurabh and Tesfaye, Beza. 2020. “Winning Hearts and Minds in Civil Wars: Governance, Leadership Change, and Support for Violent Groups in Iraq”. American Journal of Political Sciences, Early View
  28. Minkus, Lara, Deutschmann Emanuel and Delhey, Jan. 2018. “A Trump effect on the EU’s popularity? The US presidential election as a natural experiment.” Perspectives on Politics forthcoming:1–18.
  29. Müller, Stefan and Kneafsey, Liam. 2020. “Sports Games do not change political opinions in Ireland.”. https://muellerstefan.net/papers/mueller_kneafsey_irrelevance_irrelevant_events.pdf
  30. Nussio, Enzo. 2020. “Attitudinal and Emotional consequences of islamist terrorism. Evidence form the Berlin attack”. Political Psychology Early View
  31. Ojeda, Christopher. 2016. “The effect of 9/11 on the heritability of political trust.” Political psychology 37(1):73–88.
  32. Perrin, Andrew J. and Smolek, Sondra J. 2009. “Who trusts? Race, gender, and the September 11 rally effect among young adults.” Social Science Research 38(1):134–145.
  33. Raskin, Yoav and Sadeh, Tal. 2020. “Doomed to Alienate? How European Integration Feeds Euroscepticism” https://www.peio.me/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/PEIO13_paper_40_1.pdf
  34. Schraff, Dominik. 2020. “Political trust during the covid-19 pandemic: rally around the flag or lockdown effects?”. 10.31235/osf.io/pu47c
  35. Solaz, Hector, De Vries, Catherine E., Roosmarijin, de Geus. 2018. “In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies OnlineFirst:1–31.
  36. Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J., and José Rama. 2021. “When the US Far-right Sneezes, the European Far-right Catches a Cold. Quasi-experimental of Electoral Contagion from Spain.” OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s6fmj
  37. Valentim, Vicente. 2018. “Creating critical citizens? Anti-austerity protests and public opinion” SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3292157
Emotions and well-being
  1. Berger, Eva M. 2010. “The Chernobyl disaster, concern about the environment, and life satisfaction.” Kyklos 63(1):1–8.
  2. Coupe, Tom. 2017. “The impact of terrorism on expectations, trust and happiness – the case of the November 13 attacks in Paris, France.” Applied Economics Letters 24(15):1084–1087.
  3. Hariri, Jacob, Bjørnskov, Christian and Justesen, Mogens K. 2015. “Economic shocks and subjective well-being: Evidence from a quasi-experiment.The World Bank Economic Review 30(1):55–77.
  4. Metcalfe, Robertm Powdthavee, Nattavudh and Dolan, Paul. 2011. “Destruction and distress: Using a quasi-experiment to show the effects of the September 11 attacks on mental wellbeing in the United Kingdom.” The Economic Journal 121(550):F81–F103.
  5. Nagoshi, Julie L., Terrell, Heather K. and Nagoshi, Craig T. 2007. “Changes in authoritarianism and coping in college students immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.” Personality and Individual Differences 43(7):1722–1732.
  6. Nussio, Enzo. 2020. “Attitudinal and Emotional consequences of islamist terrorism. Evidence form the Berlin attack”. Political Psychology Early View
  7. Pierce, Laman, Rogers, Todd and Snyder, Jason A. 2016. “Losing Hurts: The Happiness Impact of Partisan Electoral Loss.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 3(1):44–59.
Other attitudes and beliefs
  1. Bassi, Vittorio and Rasul, Imar. 2017. “Persuasion: A case study of papal influences on fertility-related beliefs and behaviour”. American Economic Journal of Applied Economics, 4(9): 250-302
  2. Berger, Eva M. 2010. “The Chernobyl disaster, concern about the environment, and life satisfaction.” Kyklos 63(1):1–8.
  3. Bonilla, Tabitha and Grimmer, Justin. 2013. “Elevated threat levels and decreased expectations: How democracy handles terrorist threats.” Poetics 41(6):650–669.
  4. Bozzoli, Carlos and Müller, Cathérine. 2011. “Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: Evidence from the UK.” European Journal of Political Economy 27(S1):S89–S106.
  5. Coupe, Tom. 2017. “The impact of terrorism on expectations, trust and happiness – the case of the November 13 attacks in Paris, France.” Applied Economics Letters 24(15):1084–1087.
  6. Finseraas, Henning and Listhaug, Ola. 2013. “It can happen here: the impact of the Mumbai terror attacks on public opinion in Western Europe.” Public Choice 156(1-2):213–228.
  7. Geys, Benny and Qari, Salmai. 2017. “Will you still trust me tomorrow? The causal effect of terrorism on social trust.” Public Choice 96(3-4):289–305.
  8. Gorman, Brandon and Seguin, Charles. 2018. “World Citizens on the Periphery: Threat and Identification with Global Society”. American Journal of Sociology, 124(3): 705-761
  9. Hanaoka, Chie, Shigeoka, Hitoshi and Watanabe, Yasutora. 2018. “Do risk preferences change? Evidence from the great east japan earthquake”. Applied Economics 10(2)
  10. Jakiela P. and Ozier O. 2019. The impact of violence on individual risk preferences: evidence from a natural experiment.. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2019 101:3, 547-559
  11. Kim, Jin W. and Kim, Eunji. 2019. “Identifying the effect of political rumor diffusion using variations in survey timing.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 14: No. 3, pp 293-311.
  12. Muñoz, Jordi and Anduiza, Eva. 2019. “‘If a fight starts, watch the crowd’ The effect of violence on popular support for social movements.” Journal of Peace Research forthcoming.
  13. Nagoshi, Julie L., Terrell, Heather K. and Nagoshi, Craig T. 2007. “Changes in authoritarianism and coping in college students immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.” Personality and Individual Differences 43(7):1722–1732.
  14. Schaffner, Brian F. and Roche, Cameron. 2017. “Misinformation and motivated reasoning: Responses to economic news in a politicized environment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81(1):86-110
  15. Schulz, Peter J., Nakamoto, Kent, Hartung, Uwe and Faustinelli, Carmen. 2008. “The death of Rosmarie Voser: The not-so-harmful consequences of a fatal medical error.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(3):386–397.
  16. Castanho, Bruno. 2018. “The Non-Impact of the 2015 Paris Terrorist Attacks on Political Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44(6):838–850.
  17. Wicki, Michael. 2020. “Ambitious mobility policies and public opinion: Doomed to fail?” Phd diss., ETH Zurich
Policy preferences
  1. Ait Bihi Ouali, Laila. 2020. “Effects of signalling tax evasion on redistribution and voting preferences: Evidence from the Panama Papers”. PLoS ONE 15(3): e0229394
  2. Bonilla, Tabitha and Grimmer, Justin. 2013. “Elevated threat levels and decreased expectations: How democracy handles terrorist threats.” Poetics 41(6):650–669.
  3. Bozzoli, Carlos and Müller, Cathérine. 2011. “Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: Evidence from the UK.” European Journal of Political Economy 27(S1):S89–S106.
  4. Branton, Regina, Martinez-Ebers, Valerie, Carey Jr., Tony E. and Matsubayashi, Tetsuya. 2015. “Social Protest and Policy Attitudes: The Case of the 2006 Immigrant Rallies.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2):390–402.
  5. Burlacu, Diana, Immergut, Ellen M., Oskarson, Maria and Rönnerstrand, Björn. 2018. “The politics of credit claiming: Rights and recognition in health policy feedback.” Social Policy & Administration 52(4):880–894.
  6. Finseraas, Henning and Listhaug, Ola. 2013. “It can happen here: the impact of the Mumbai terror attacks on public opinion in Western Europe.” Public Choice 156(1-2):213–228.
  7. Slothuus, Rune. 2010. “When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment” Political Communication 27(2):158–177.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ares, Macarena and Enrique Hernández. 2017. “The corrosive effect of corruption on trust in politicians: Evidence from a natural experiment.” Research & Politics 4(2):1–8.

  • Event Information: Corruption. “Bárcenas” corruption scandal in Spain in 2013.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Trust in politicians.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. 2015 Spanish wave.

Bassi, Vittorio and Imran Rasul. 2017. “Persuasion: A case study of papal influences on fertility-related beliefs and behaviour”. American Economic Journal of Applied Economics, 4(9): 250-302

  • Event Information: Statements and rumors. Papal visit to Brazil in October 1991.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Individual intentions to contracept.
  • Survey Information: Demographic and Health Survery. 1991.

Balcells, Laia and Gerard Torrats-Espinosa. 2018. “Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(42):10624–10629.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. ETA terror attacks in Spain.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Participation and incumbent voting.
  • Survey Information: Surveys of the Spanish Centre for Sociological Research (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Spain). 1836, 1873, 1967, 2130, 2131, 2152 and 2254.

Belmonte, Alessandro. 2020. “Inter-Ethnic Dynamics in the Wake of Terrorist Attacks: Evidence from the 2015 Baga Massacre.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy  https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0009

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Boko Haram 2015 massacre in Nigeria.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward ethnic groups.
  • Survey Information: Afrobarometer. 2014-2015.

Berger, Eva M. 2010. “The Chernobyl disaster, concern about the environment, and life satisfaction.” Kyklos 63(1):1–8.

  • Event Information: Accidents, fatalities, disasters, and epidemics. 2016 Panama Papers Scandal.
  • Outcome Information: Emotions and well-being/Other attitudes and beliefs. Life satisfaction and concern for environment.
  • Survey Information: German Socio-Economic Panel Study Innovation. 1984-1986.

Ait Bihi Ouali, Laila. 2020. “Effects of signalling tax evasion on redistribution and voting preferences: Evidence from the Panama Papers”. PLoS ONE 15(3): e0229394

  • Event Information: Corruption. Chernobyl nuclear accident on 26 April 1986.
  • Outcome Information: Policy preferences. Attitudes toward redistribution and voting intentions.
  • Survey InformationEuropean Social Survey. 2014-2016.

Bol, Damien, Marco Giani, André Blais and Peter J. Loewen. “The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?”. European Journal of Political Research, forthcoming

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. COVID-19 lockdowns in Europe in March 2020.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Voting for the incumbent, trust in government, and satisfaction with democracy.
  • Survey Information: Research Survey. 2020.

Bonilla, Tabitha and Justin Grimmer. 2013. “Elevated threat levels and decreased expectations: How democracy handles terrorist threats.” Poetics 41(6):650–669.

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. US government elevation of terror alerts between 2002 and 2004.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs/Policy preferences. Perception of terror and attitudes toward incumbent and other policies.
  • Survey Information: Gallup (investor and adult); ABC-Washington Post; Pew; National Annenberg Election Study. 2002-2004.

Boomgaarden, Hajo G. and Claes H. de Vreese. 2007. “Dramatic Real-world Events and Public Opinion Dynamics: Media Coverage and its Impact on Public Reactions to an Assassination.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19(3):354–366.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Murder of Theo van Gogh on 2 November 2004.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward immigration.
  • Survey Information: Research Survey. 2004.

Boydstun, Amber E., Jessica T. Feezell and Rebecca A. Glazier. 2018. “In the wake of a terrorist attack, do Americans’ attitudes toward Muslims decline?” Research & Politics 5(4):1–7.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terror attacks in Paris and San Bernardino on November and December 2015.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward muslims.
  • Survey Information: Web-based Survey. 2015.

Bozzoli, Carlos and Cathérine Müller. 2011. “Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: Evidence from the UK.” European Journal of Political Economy 27(S1):S89–S106.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terrorists attacks in London on 7 July 2005.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs/Policy preferences. Perception of risk and attitudes toward policies.
  • Survey Information: British Social Attitudes Survey. June-November 2005.

Bridgman, Aengus, Costin Ciobanu, Aaron Erlich, Danielle Bohonos and Christopher Ross. 2020. “Unveilling: the electoral consequences of an exogenous mid-campaign court ruling”. Journal of Politics, forthcoming

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Ruling of the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal affirming the right for women to wear the niqab in 2015.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Propensity to vote for the leading party.
  • Survey Information: Canadian Election Study. 2015.

Branton, Regina, Valerie Martinez-Ebers, Tony E. Carey Jr. and Tetsuya Matsubayashi. 2015. “Social Protest and Policy Attitudes: The Case of the 2006 Immigrant Rallies.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2):390–402.

  • Event Information: Protest and Repression. Protests against the law H.R. 4437 in 2006.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups/Policy preferences. Preferences for immigration policy.
  • Survey InformationLatino National Survey. 2006.

Brugarolas, Pablo and Miller, Luis. 2021. “The Causal Effect of Polls on Turnout Intention: A Local Randomization Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Political Analysis 1-7. doi:10.1017/pan.2020.50

  • Event Information: Election results. Two large pre-election polls carried out by the Spanish Sociological Research Center CIS before the April 2019 national elections.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Voter turnout.

Burlacu, Diana, Immergut, Ellen M., Oskarson, Maria and Rönnerstrand, Björn. 2018. “The politics of credit claiming: Rights and recognition in health policy feedback.” Social Policy & Administration 52(4):880–894.

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Maximum waiting time for health services law in Germany and Sweden (2015-2016).
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties/Policy preferences. Attitudes toward the health care system.
  • Survey Information: German Socio-Economic Panel Study Innovation Sample and Swedish Society Opinion Media. 2015 and 2016

Carey Jr, Tony E., Branton, Regina P. and Martinez-Eber, Valerie. 2014. “The influence of social protests on issue salience among latinos.” Political Research Quarterly 67(3):615–627.

  • Event Information: Protest and Repression. Protests against the law H.R. 4437 in 2006.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Perceptions of immigration.
  • Survey InformationLatino National Survey. 2006.

Casas, Agustín, Curci, Federico and De Moragas, Antoni-Italo. 2020. “Checks and Balances and Nation Building: The Spanish Constitutional Court and Catalonia”. SIOE Conference: 2020

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Ruling of the Spanish Consitutional Court on the Catalan Constitution in 2010.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Support for the secession of Catalonia.
  • Survey InformationCatalan Public Opinion Center Barometer. June-July 2010.

Nägel Christof and Lutter, Mark. 2020. “The christmas market attack in Berlin and attitudes toward refugees: a natural experiment with data from the european social survey”. European Journal of Securirty Research: 202)

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Chirstmas market terror attack in Berlin in 2016.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward refugees.
  • Survey InformationEuropean Social Survey. Germany 2016-2017.

Coupe, Tom. 2017. “The impact of terrorism on expectations, trust and happiness – the case of the November 13 attacks in Paris, France.” Applied Economics Letters 24(15):1084–1087.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terror attacks in Paris on November 2015.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties/Emotions and well-being/Other attitudes and beliefs. Life satisfaction, optimism, attitudes toward incumbent and political orientation.
  • Survey Information: EuroBarometer. November 2015.

Curtice, Travis. 2019. “How Repression A ffects Public Perceptions of Police: Evidence from Uganda” https://traviscurticedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2019/11/how-repression-affects-public-perceptions-of-police.pdf

  • Event Information: Protests and Repression. Social Media Tax Protests in Uganda on 11 July 2018.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Attitudes toward the police.
  • Survey Information: Research Survey. June-July 2018

Das, Enny, Bezemer, Marieke D., Kerkhof, Peter and Vermeulen, Ivar E. 2009. “How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(3):453–459.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Murder of Theo van Gogh on 2 November 2004.
  • Outcome Information:Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward muslims.
  • Survey Information: Web-based Survey. 2004.

Depetris-Chauvin, Emilio, Durante, Ruben and Campante, Felipe R. 2018. “Building Nations through shared experiences: Evidence from African football”. American Economic Review https://www.nber.org/papers/w24666.pdf

  • Event Information: Sports. National football teams’ victories in Sub-Saharan Africa between 2000 and 2015.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward in-groups and national identity.
  • Survey Information. Afrobarometer. 2002 to 2013.

De Vries, Catherine E. 2018. Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Event Information: Corruption. “Bárcenas” corruption scandal in Spain in 2013; “Cash for influence” corruption scandal in the European Parliament; Ahtisaari Nobel Peace Prize in Finland in 2008; Receipt of Nobel Peace Prize of the EU in 2012.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Attitudes toward EU membership and institutions.
  • Survey InformationEuropean Social Survey. 2012 Spanish survey; 2010 Cypriote survey; 2008 Finnish survey; 2012 German survey

De Vries, Catherine E., Bakker, Bert N., Bolt, Sarah and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2020. “Crisis Signaling: How Italy’s Coronavirus Lockdown Affected Incumbent Support in Other European Countries” SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606149

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. COVID-19 lockdown in Italy in March 2020.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Incumbent support in other countries.
  • Survey InformationEupinions online survey. 2020.

Dinas, Elias, Hartman, Erin and van Spanje, Joost. 2016. “Dead man walking: The affective roots of issue proximity between voters and parties.” Political Behavior 38(3):659–687.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Murder of Pim Fortuyn (LFP leader) on 6 May 2002.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Proximity with political parties.
  • Survey Information: Dutch Parliamentary Election Study. 2002.

Dinesen, Peter and Meier, Mads. 2013. “The effect of terror on institutional trust: New evidence from the 3/11 Madrid terrorist attack.” Political Psychology 34(6):917–926.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terrorist attack in Madrid on 11 March 2004.
  • Outcome InformationAttitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Trust in political institutions, media, and justice.
  • Survey Information: EuroBarometer. 2004.

Falcó-Gimeno, Albert, and Fernandez-Vazquez, Pablo. 2020. “Choices That Matter: Coalition Formation and Parties’ Ideological Reputations.” Political Science Research and Methods 8(2): 285–300

  • Event Information:  Policies and political and judicial decisions. Announcement of coalition government agreements in Germany 2009 and UK 2010.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Perceptions of party positions.
  • Survey Information: German Election Study and British Election Study Internet Panel. 2009 and 2010.

Ferrín, Mónica, Mancosu, Moreno and Cappiali, Teresa M. 2019. “Terrorists attacsk and Europeans’ attitudes towards immigrants: An experimental Approach”. European Journal of Political Research, Early View

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terror attacks in Paris on November 2015.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward immigrants.
  • Survey InformationEurobarometer. November 2015.

Finseraas, Henning and Listhaug, Ola. 2013. “It can happen here: the impact of the Mumbai terror attacks on public opinion in Western Europe.” Public Choice 156(1-2):213–228.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terror attacks in Mumbai in 2008.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs/Policy preferences. Fear of terrorism, policy preferences, and ideological orientation.
  • Survey InformationEuropean Social Survey. Fourth wave 2008.

Finseraas, Henning, Jakobsson, Niklas and Kotsadam, Andreas. 2011. “Did the murder of Theo van Gogh change Europeans’ immigration policy preferences?” Kyklos 64(3):396–409.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Murder of Theo van Gogh on 2 November 2004.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Immigration policy preferences.
  • Survey InformationEuropean Social Survey. November 2004.

Flores, René D. 2018. “Can Elites Shape Public Attitudes Toward Immigrants?: Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Social Forces 96(4):1649–1690.

  • Event Information: Statement and Rumors. Donald Trump’s presidential campaign announcement in 2016.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward immigration.
  • Survey Information: Gallup. May-July 2016.

  • Event Information: Protests and Repression. Moscow protests after the parliamentary elections on May 2011.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Trust in government.
  • Survey Information: Research Survey. November-December 2011.

Larsen, Eric G., Cutts, David and Goodwin, Matthew J. 2019. “Do terrorist attacks feed populist eurosceptics? Evidence from two comparative quasi-experiments”. European Journal of Political Research 59(1):182-205

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Chirstmas market terror attack in Berlin in 2016.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups/Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Attitudes toward immigrants, refugees, and the EU.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey and Chatam House Survey. 2016 and 2016-2017.

García-Ponce, Omar and Pasquale, Benjamin. 2015. “How Political Repression Shapes Attitudes.Toward the State: Evidence from Zimbabwe.”. http://omargarciaponce.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GarciaPonce_and_Pasquale_2014.pdf

  • Event Information: Protests and Repression. State repression events in Zimbabwe from 2004 to 2010.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Trust in the state, the president, and the ruling party.
  • Survey Information: Afrobarometer. 2004, 2005 and 2009

Kostas, Geminis, Bruinsma, Bastiaan and Germann, Micha. 2019. “The electoral effects of a diplomatic stand-off: Evidence from a natural experiment.” European Consortium of Political Research General Conference 2019

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Diplomatic stand-off between Turkey and the Netherlands in 2017.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Propensities to vote for parties.
  • Survey Information: Web-based Survey. 2017.

Geys, Benny and Qari, Salmai. 2017. “Will you still trust me tomorrow? The causal effect of terrorism on social trust.” Public Choice 96(3-4):289–305.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Stockholm bombs on 11 December 2010.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Social trust.
  • Survey Information: Swedish Society Opinion Media. 2010.

Giani, Marco. 2020. “Fear Without Prejudice in the Shadow of Jihadist Threat.” Comparative Political Studies OnlineFirst:1–20.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Jihadist attacks ocurred between 2002 and 2016.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward immigration.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. 2016.

Giani M. and Méon Pierre-Guillaume. 2019. “Global Racist Contagion Following Donald Trump’s Election.” British Journal of Political Science, 1-8.

  • Event Information: Election Results. Trump’s victory in 2016 US presidential elections.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward race-targeting policies.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. 2016

Gorman, Brandon and Seguin, Charles. 2018. “World Citizens on the Periphery: Threat and Identification with Global Society”. American Journal of Sociology, 124(3): 705-761

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terror attack in Beirut (Lebanon) in July 2013.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Attitudes toward globalization and openness.
  • Survey InformationArab Barometer. Third wave 2013.

Hariri, Jacob, Bjørnskov, Christian and Justesen, Mogens K. 2015. “Economic shocks and subjective well-being: Evidence from a quasi-experiment.The World Bank Economic Review 30(1):55–77.

  • Event Information: Economic Shocks. Currency devaluation in Botswana on May 2005.
  • Outcome Information: Emotions and well-being. Subjective well-being.
  • Survey Information: Afrobarometer. 2005.

Hanaoka, Chie, Shigeoka, Hitoshi and Watanabe, Yasutora. 2018. “Do risk preferences change? Evidence from the great east japan earthquake”. Applied Economics 10(2)

  • Event Information: Accidents, fatalities, disasters, and epidemics. 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Risk preferences.
  • Survey Information: Japan Household Panel Survey on Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction. 2011.

Hartnett, Rodney T. and Libby, Carol U. 1968. Agreement with views of Martin Luther King, Jr. Before and after his assassination“. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1968: i-15

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Murder of Martin Luther King on 4 April 1968.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Proximity to Dr. Martin Luther King’s views.
  • Survey InformationResearch Survey. 1968.

Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil and Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia. 2010. “Irrelevant events affect voters’ evaluations of government performence”.

  • Event Information: Sports. 2009 NCAA men’s college basketball tournament’s results.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Presidential approval.
  • Survey InformationResearch Survey. 2009.

Hofstetter, Richard C. 1969. “Political Disengagement and the Death of Martin Luther King.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 33(2):174–179.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Murder of Martin Luther King on 4 April 1968.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Personal affect toward components of the political system.
  • Survey InformationResearch Survey. 1968.

Holbrook, Thomas M., Clayton, Clouse and Weinschenk, Aaron C. 2012. “Bringing the president back in: The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the evolution of retrospective voting in the 2008 presidential election.” Political Research Quarterly 65(2):263–274.

  • Event Information: Economic Shocks. Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Retrospective voting.
  • Survey Information: American National Election Study. 2008-2009.

Pamela, Jakiela and Ozier, Owen. 2019. The impact of violence on individual risk preferences: evidence from a natural experiment.. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2019 101:3, 547-559

  • Event Information: Election Results. Kenya’s 2007 post-election crisis.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Risk aversion.
  • Survey Information: Kenyan Life Panel Survey. 2007-2009.

Jakobsson, Niklas and Blom, Svein. 2014. “Did the 2011 Terror Attacks in Norway Change Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Immigrants?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(4):475–486.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Oslo and Utøya attacks on 22 July 2011.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward immigration.
  • Survey Information: Statistics Norway’s survey on attitudes toward immigrants. 2011.

Jensen, Carsten and Naumann, Elias. 2016. “Increasing pressures and support for public health-care in Europe.” Health Policy 120(6):698–705.

  • Event Information: Others. Flu epidemic in 2008.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Attitudes toward the health care system.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. 2008.

Kim, Jin W. and Kim, Eunji. 2019. “Identifying the effect of political rumor diffusion using variations in survey timing.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 14: No. 3, pp 293-311.

  • Event Information: Statement and rumors. Spread of “Obama-is-a-Muslim” rumor in September 2008.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Rumor diffusion.
  • Survey Information: American National Election Study. 2008.

Krosnick, Jon A. and Kinder Donald R. 1990. “Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming.” American Political Science Review 84(2):497–512.

  • Event Information: Corruption. Disclosure of diversion of funds to Nicaraguan Contras from secret sale of weapons to Iran in 1986.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Support for the incumbent.
  • Survey Information: American National Election Study. 1986.

Larsen, Erik G. 2018. “Welfare Retrenchments and Government Support: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” European Sociological Review 34(1):40–51.

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Retrechment reform of the education grant system in Denmark in 2013.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Government support.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. 2013.

Legewie, Joscha. 2013. “Terrorist Events and Attitudes toward Immigrants: A Natural Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 118(5):1199–1245.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terrorists attacks in Bali on 12 October 2002.
  • Outcome InformationAttitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward immigrants.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. 2002.

Lever, H. 1969. “The Johannesburg Station Explosion and Ethnic Attitudes.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 33(2):180–189.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Explosion in the Johannesburg railway station on 24 July 1964.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward out-groups.
  • Survey Information: Research Survey. May-September 1964.

Van Hauawaert, Steven M. and Huber, Robert A. 2020. “In-group solidarity or out-group hostility in response to terrorism in France? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design.” European Journal of Political Research Early View

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terror attacks in Paris on November 2015.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward out-groups and in-group.
  • Survey Information: France DREES Barometer. 2015.

Merler, Silvia. 2019. “Technocracy, trust and democracy: Evidence os citizens’ attitudes from a natraul experiment in Italy.” Government and Opposition, 1-25

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Appointment of the Monti technocratic cabinet in 2011.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Satisfaction with democracy.
  • Survey Information: EuroBarometer. November 2011.

Metcalfe, Robert Powdthavee, Nattavudh and Dolan, Paul. 2011. “Destruction and distress: Using a quasi-experiment to show the effects of the September 11 attacks on mental wellbeing in the United Kingdom.” The Economic Journal 121(550):F81–F103.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. World Trade Center attacks on 11 September 2001.
  • Outcome Information: Emotions and well-being. Subjective well-being.
  • Survey Information: British Household Panel Survey. 2001.

Mikulaschek, Cristhoph, Pant, Saurabh and Tesfaye, Beza. 2020. “Winning Hearts and Minds in Civil Wars: Governance, Leadership Change, and Support for Violent Groups in Iraq”. American Journal of Political Sciences, Early View

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Resignation of Iraq’s prime minister in August 2014.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Attitudes toward the Iraqi’s government, oppostion groups, and the political system.
  • Survey Information: Private National Survey. 2014.

Minkus, Lara, Deutschmann Emanuel and Delhey, Jan. 2018. “A Trump effect on the EU’s popularity? The US presidential election as a natural experiment.” Perspectives on Politics forthcoming:1–18.

  • Event Information: Election Results. Trump’s victory in 2016 US presidential elections.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Attitudes toward the EU.
  • Survey Information: EuroBarometer. November 2016.

Müller, Stefan and Kneafsey, Liam. 2020. “Sports Games do not change political opinions in Ireland.”. https://muellerstefan.net/papers/mueller_kneafsey_irrelevance_irrelevant_events.pdf

  • Event Information: Sports. 2002 and 2007 All-Ireland Championships results.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Voting for the incumbent.
  • Survey Information: Irish National Election Study.  2002 and 2007.

Muñoz, Jordi and Anduiza, Eva. 2019. “‘If a fight starts, watch the crowd’ The effect of violence on popular support for social movements.” Journal of Peace Research forthcoming.

  • Event Information: Protests and Repression. Barcelona riots following eviction of a squat group bank May 2016.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Support for social movement.
  • Survey Information: Research Survey. May 2016.

Nagoshi, Julie L., Terrell, Heather K. and Nagoshi, Craig T. 2007. “Changes in authoritarianism and coping in college students immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.” Personality and Individual Differences 43(7):1722–1732.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. World Trade Center attacks on 11 September 2001.
  • Outcome Information: Emotions and well-being/Other attitudes and beliefs. Emotional state, coping strategies, authoritarianism, and social dominance.
  • Survey Information: Research Survey. Arizona University September 2001.

Nussio, Enzo, Bove, Vincenzo and Steele, Bridget. 2019. “The consequences of terrorism on migration attitudes across Europe.”. Political Geography 75:102047

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terror attacks in Paris on November 2015.
  • Outcome InformationAttitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups.Attitudes toward immigrants and refugees.
  • Survey Information: EuroBarometer. 2015.

Nussio, Enzo. 2020. “Attitudinal and Emotional consequences of islamist terrorism. Evidence from the Berlin attack”. Political Psychology Early View

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Chirstmas market terror attack in Berlin in 2016.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups/Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties/Emotions and well-being. Emotional state, trust in government, national identification, and attitudes toward religion..
  • Survey Information: GESIS. 2017.

Ojeda, Christopher. 2016. “The effect of 9/11 on the heritability of political trust.” Political psychology 37(1):73–88.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. World Trade Center attacks on 11 September 2001.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Trust in government.
  • Survey Information: National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Third wave, 2001.

Perrin, Andrew J. and Smolek, Sondra J. 2009. “Who trusts? Race, gender, and the September 11 rally effect among young adults.” Social Science Research 38(1):134–145.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. World Trade Center attacks on 11 September 2001.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Trust in government.
  • Survey Information: National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Third wave, 2001.

Pierce, Laman, Rogers, Todd and Snyder, Jason A. 2016. “Losing Hurts: The Happiness Impact of Partisan Electoral Loss.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 3(1):44–59.

  • Event Information: Election Results. Results of 2012 US presidential election.
  • Outcome Information: Emotions and well-being. Happiness.
  • Survey Information: United States General Social Survey. 2012.

Raskin, Yoav and Sadeh, Tal. 2020. “Doomed to Alienate? How European Integration Feeds Euroscepticism” https://www.peio.me/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/PEIO13_paper_40_1.pdf

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. EU integration events
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Euroscepticism.
  • Survey Information: Eurobarometer. Survey 39.1/ Danish TEU referendum. 2006.

Reeves, Aaron and de Vries, Robert. 2016. “Does media coverage influence public attitudes towards welfare recipients? The impact of the 2011 English riots.” The British Journal of Sociology 67(2):281–306.

  • Event Information: Protests and Repression. Shooting of Mark Duggan by police on 4 august 2011.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward welfare recipients.
  • Survey Information: Brittish Social Attitudes Survey. 2011.

Schaffner, Brian F. and Roche, Cameron. 2017. “Misinformation and motivated reasoning: Responses to economic news in a politicized environment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81(1):86-110

  • Event Information: Policies and Political Decesions. Announcement of unemployment rate during Obama’s presidency.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Accuracy of unemployment perceptions.
  • Survey Information: Cooperative Congressional Election Study. 2010-2012.

Schraff, Dominik. 2020. “Political trust during the covid-19 pandemic: rally around the flag or lockdown effects?”. 10.31235/osf.io/pu47c

  • Event Information: Accidents, fatalities, disasters, and epidemics. Covid-19 infections and lockdowns.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Political trust.
  • Survey Information: Dutch Household Survey. March 2020.

Schulz, Peter J., Nakamoto, Kent, Hartung, Uwe and Faustinelli, Carmen. 2008. “The death of Rosmarie Voser: The not-so-harmful consequences of a fatal medical error.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(3):386–397.

  • Event Information: Accidents, fatalities, disasters, and epidemics. Death of Rosmarie Voser after heart transplant in 2004.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Attitudes toward organ donation
  • Survey Information: Reasearch Survey. 2004.

Schwartz, Cassilde, Simon, Miranda, Hudson, David and van-Heerde-Hudson, Jennifer. 2018. “A populist paradox? How Brexit softened anti-immigrant attitudes”. British Journal of Political Science, 1-21.

  • Event Information: Election Results. Brexit Referendum in 2016.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Anti-immigrant attitudes.
  • Survey InformationOnline Survey. Aid Attitudes Tracker. 2015-2017.

Silber, Heather M. 2013. “Can protests make Latinos “American”? Identity, immigration politics, and the 2006 marches.” American Politics Research 41(2):298–327.

  • Event Information: Protest and Repression. Protests against the law H.R. 4437 in 2006.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Ethnic identity.
  • Survey Information: Latino National Survey. 2006.

Castanho, Bruno. 2018. “The Non-Impact of the 2015 Paris Terrorist Attacks on Political Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44(6):838–850.

  • Event Information: Terrorism. Terror attacks in Paris on November 2015.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups/Other attitudes and beliefs. Policy preferences for immigration and refugees, xenophobia, and ideological orientation.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. 2015.

Slothuus, Rune. 2010. “When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment” Political Communication 27(2):158–17

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Shifts in party frames of salient political issues.
  • Outcome Information: Policy preferences. Policy preferences.
  • Survey Information: Danish National Election Survey. 2005.

Solaz, Hector, De Vries, Catherine E., Roosmarijin, de Geus. 2018. “In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies OnlineFirst:1–31.

  • Event Information: Corruption. “Bárcenas” corruption scandal in Spain in 2013.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Support for the incumbent.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. 2012 Spanish wave.

Solodoch, Omor. 2019. “Regaining control? The political impact of policy responses to refugee crises”. SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484753

  • Event Information: Policies and political and judicial decisions. Swedish border controls (2015-2016) and the EU-Turkey Agreement (2016).
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Attitudes toward immigration and support for radical-right parties.
  • Survey Information: EuroBarometer. November 2014-May 2015.

Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart and José Rama. 2021. “When the US far-right sneezes, the European far-right catches a cold. Quasi-experimental of electoral contagion from Spain”. OSF Preprints https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s6fmj

  • Event Information: Election results. Trump’s electoral defeat in the US (2020).
  • Outcome InformationAttitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Support for radical-right party.
  • Survey Information: Spanish CIS survey 3300. November 2020.

Valentim, Vicente. 2018. “Creating critical citizens? Anti-austerity protests and public opinion” SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3292157

  • Event Information: Protest and Repression. Anti-austerity Protest in Portugal on 12 March 2011.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward institutions, politicians, and parties. Attitudes toward elites and political engagement.
  • Survey Information: European Social Survey. Portuguese wave 2011.

Wicki, Michael. 2020. “Ambitious mobility policies and public opinion: Doomed to fail?” Phd diss., ETH Zurich

  • Event Information: Accidents, fatalities, disasters, and epidemics. Accidental killing of pedestrain by self-driving vehicle in Arizona in 2018.
  • Outcome Information: Other attitudes and beliefs. Attitudes toward self-driving vehicles.
  • Survey Information: Research Survey. 2018.

Zepeda-Millán, Chris and Wallace, Sophia J. 2013. “Racialization in times of contention: How social movements influence Latino racial identity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 1(4):510–527.

  • Event Information: Protest and Repression. Protests against the law H.R. 4437 in 2006.
  • Outcome Information: Attitudes toward immigration, ethnic groups, and other out-groups. Racial identity.
  • Survey Information: Latino National Survey. 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact with us for including other studies which use UESD and are not in the Repository

2 + 9 =