BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//wp-events-plugin.com//7.2.3.1//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:1808@ub.edu
DTSTART:20220318T100000Z
DTEND:20220318T120000Z
DTSTAMP:20250928T160320Z
URL:https://www.ub.edu/grc_logos/activities/eight-session/
SUMMARY:Eight session
DESCRIPTION:Philosophers often characterize discourse in general as aiming 
 at some sort of convergence (in beliefs\, plans\, dispositions\, feelings\
 , etc.)\, and many views about aesthetic discourse in particular affirm th
 is thought. I argue that a convergence norm does not govern aesthetic disc
 ourse. The conversational dynamics of aesthetic discourse suggest that typ
 ical aesthetic claims have directive force. I distinguish between dynamic 
 and illocutionary force and develop related theories of each for aesthetic
  discourse. I argue that the illocutionary force of aesthetic utterances i
 s typically invitational because its dynamic force is influenced by a &lsq
 uo\;communal&rsquo\; norm. I draw on dynamic pragmatics to develop a forma
 l account of this dynamic force that explains why invitation has pride of 
 place in aesthetic conversation. It turns out that the end of aesthetic di
 scourse is not convergence but a distinctive form of community\, a kind of
  harmony of individuality\, that is compatible with aesthetic disagreement
 . If this is right\, then convergence theories of aesthetic and normative 
 discourse\, and of conversation in general\, need to be revised.&nbsp\;Rig
 gle\, Nick (forthcoming). Convergence\, Community\, and Force in Aesthetic
  Discourse. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
LOCATION:via zoom
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=\, Spain;X-APPLE-RADIUS=100
 ;X-TITLE=via zoom:geo:0,0
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR