BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//wp-events-plugin.com//7.4.0.1//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:227@ub.edu
DTSTART:20150225T130000Z
DTEND:20150225T150000Z
DTSTAMP:20250915T094554Z
URL:https://www.ub.edu/grc_logos/activities/what-is-said/
SUMMARY:What is Said?
DESCRIPTION:It is sometimes argued that certain sentences of natural langua
 ge fail to express a determinate truth conditional content. Standard examp
 les include e.g. &#39\;Tipper is ready&#39\; and &#39\;Steel is strong eno
 ugh&#39\;. In this paper\, we provide a novel analysis of truth conditiona
 l meaning (&#39\;what is said&#39\;) using the notion of a&nbsp\;question 
 under discussion. This account (i) explains why these types of sentences a
 re not\, in fact\, semantically underdetermined (yet seem truth conditiona
 lly incomplete)\, (ii) provides a principled analysis of the process by wh
 ich natural language sentences (in general) can come to have enriched mean
 ings in context\, and (iii) shows why various alternative views\, e.g. so-
 called Radical Contextualism\, Moderate Contextualism\, and Semantic Minim
 alism\, are partially right in their respective analyses of the problem\, 
 but also all ultimately wrong. Our analysis relies on a standard truth con
 ditional and compositional semantics and refrains from making any assumpti
 ons about enriched logical forms\, i.e. logical forms containing phonologi
 cally null expressions.
CATEGORIES:Colloquium
LOCATION:Seminari de Filosofia UB
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=C. Montalegre\, 6-8\, Barce
 lona\, 08001\, Spain;X-APPLE-RADIUS=100;X-TITLE=Seminari de Filosofia UB:g
 eo:0,0
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR