Projects   >   DIAPHORA

DIAPHORA

1 Jan 2016 / 31 Dec 2019
H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015-675415

Scientists in charge:

Sven Rosenkranz (ICREA-UB, coordinator)

Fabrice Correia (University of Neuchâtel)
Hannes Leitgeb (MCMP/University of Munich)
Kathrin Glüer-Pagin (University of Stockholm)
Duncan Pritchard (EIDYN/University of Edinburgh)
Francois Recanati (CNRS/École Normale Supérieure)
Crispin Wright (University of Stirling/New York University)

 

Local team members:

Esa Díaz-León (UB)

José Díez (UB)

Manuel García-Carpintero (UB)

Carl Hoefer (ICREA-UB)

Max Kölbel (ICREA-UB)

Josep Macià (UB)

Teresa Marques (UB)

Genoveva Martí (ICREA-UB)

Pepe Martínez (UB)

Josefa Toribio (ICREA-UB)

Matheus Valente (UB)

Lisa Vogt (UB)

Indrek Reiland (UB)

Michele Palmira (UB)

Summary

DIAPHORA serves as a European research and training platform for collaborative research on the nature of philosophical problems, their resilience and the sources of persistent divergence of expert opinion about them, and their relation to conflicts in the practical sphere. More specifically, DIAPHORA’s 3 principal research objectives are (A) to diagnose what makes philosophical problems so resilient and to clarify to what extent the sustained lack of convergence in philosophy can successfully be explained by the hardness of its problems; (B) to explain why the tendency has not been towards a general agnosticism about candidate solutions, but rather towards divergence, and to identify features of philosophical method that allow for such persistent peer disagreement; and (C) to explore whether the dynamics of philosophical debate, despite the subject’s highly theoretical nature, bears important and instructive resemblances to the dynamics of debates about more practical matters and their political and socio-economical antecedents – and hence whether philosophical problems and their attempted resolution can illuminate, and be illuminated by, the procedural and methodological difficulties besetting strategies for the adjudication of public affairs, thereby determining what philosophical thought might contribute to society at large. DIAPHORA joins 7 leading European research centres in philosophy, and 5 partner organisations, 3 of which from the nonacademic sector, in the fields of international conflict management, mediation and policy-making, as well as the analysis of social conflict and cultural diversity. It undertakes to provide 14 Early Stage Researchers with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet the demands of top-level research within its remit, as well as professional complementary skills training in both the academic and non-academic sectors, with the goal of widening their potential societal contributions and improving their individual career prospects.

Total budget: €3670854
14 Early Stage Researchers (of whom 2 recruited by the UB)

Webpage:

http://www.ub.edu/diaphora/

 

Related publications

Manuel García-Carpintero, Michele Palmira   |   2022
What Do Propositions Explain? Inflationary vs. Deflationary Perspectives and The Case of Singular Propositions

Synthese, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03467-7

Josefa Toribio   |   2021
“Implicit Bias and the Fragmented Mind”

In Dirk Kindermann, Cristina Borgoni and Andrea Onofri (Eds.), The Fragmented Mind, pp. 303–324. Oxford: OUP.

Genoveva Martí, Lorena Ramírez-Ludeña   |   2021
Tolerance, Flexibility and the application of kind terms.

Synthese,198: 2973-2986

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01898-9
Josefa Toribio   |   2020
"La experiencia visual: rica pero impenetrable"

In Álvaro Peláez and Ignacio Cervieri (Eds.) Contenido y Fenomenología de la Percepción: Aproximaciones Filosóficas. Ciudad de México: Gedisa-UNAM, pp. 79–109.

Josefa Toribio   |   2020
"Molyneux's question and perceptual judgments"

In Gabriele Ferretti and Brian Blenney (Eds.). Molyneux's Question. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 266–283.

Esa Díaz-León   |   2020
"On the Conceptual Mismatch Argument: Descriptions, Disagreement, and Amelioration"

In T. Marques & A. Wikforss (eds), Shifting Concepts: The Philosophy and Psychology of Concept Variability, Oxford University Press, pp. 190-212, May 2020.

Esa Díaz-León   |   2020
"The Meta-Problem of Consciousness and the Phenomenal Concept Strategy"

Journal of Consciousness Studies, 27 (5-6), pp. 62-73.

Sven Rosenkranz, Fabrice Correia   |   2020
On the Relation between Modality and Tense

Inquiry 63 (2020), 586-604

Sven Rosenkranz, Fabrice Correia   |   2020
Temporal Existence and Temporal Location

Philosophical Studies 177 (2020), 1999-2011

Sven Rosenkranz, Fabrice Correia   |   2020
Unfreezing the Spotlight: Tense Realism and Temporal Passage

Analysis 80 (2020), 21-30

Esa Díaz-León   |   2019
"Relativism and Race"

In M. Kusch (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism, Routledge, pp. 265-71.

Josefa Toribio   |   2019
"Visual categorization"

In Brian Glenney and José Filipe Pereira da Silva (Eds.) The Senses and the History of Philosophy. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 292–307.

Sven Rosenkranz, Fabrice Correia   |   2018
Nothing To Come. A Defence of the Growing Block Theory of Time

Synthese Library Series 395, Berlin/New York: Springer Press