Technology-Driven Surrogates and the Perils of Epistemic Misalignment: An Analysis from Contemporary Microbiome Science
The Affective Nature of Horror
in M. Ryynänen et al. (eds), Cultural Approaches to Disgust and the Visceral, Routledge [open access]
The Explanationist and the Modalist (Episteme)
The Explanationist and the Modalist (Episteme).
The Metaphysics of Passage in Dynamical Reduction Models of Quantum Mechanics
In Santelli, A. & Donati, D. (eds.), Ockhamism and Philosophy of Time, Synthese Library, Springer.
The physics and metaphysics of pure shape dynamics
Forthcoming in A. Vassallo, editor, The Foundations of Spacetime Physics: Philosophical Perspectives, chapter 4. Routledge, 2022.
The Relation between Shannon Information and Semantic Information
The way things go: Moral relativism and suspension of judgment
Philosophical Studies, 179(1), 49–64
Trolling as Speech Act
The Journal of Social Philosophy, Volume 53, Issue3, Fall 2022 Pp. 404-420
Truth in Fiction Reprised
British Journal of Aesthetics, 62 (2), 307-324
Ugliness Is in the Gut of the Beholder.
Valor semántico y contenido asertórico en Frege
Revista de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España, 66, 44–46
What Do Propositions Explain? Inflationary vs. Deflationary Perspectives and The Case of Singular Propositions
Synthese, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03467-7
Who knows what Mary knew? An experimental study
Philosophical Psychology, 35: 522-545.
Williamson on Defining Knowledge
Episteme. A Journal of Individual and Social Epistemology 19/22, pp. 286-302. DOI: 10.1017/epi.2020.27. (URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/epi.2020.27). Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 July 2020.
‘Augustine on Active Perception, Awareness, and Representation’, Phronesis 66 (2021): 84–110.
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10035
‘Colocationist Answers to the Grounding Problem’
Theoria. A Swedish Journal of Philosophy 87 (6): 1444-1467.
‘Veritism Refuted? Understanding, Idealizations, and the Facts’, Synthese 198 (2021): 4295–4313.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02342-2
“Are visuomotor representations cognitively penetrable? Biasing action-guiding vision”.
Synthese, 198 (Suppl. 17): S4163–S4181.
“Implicit Bias and the Fragmented Mind”
In Dirk Kindermann, Cristina Borgoni and Andrea Onofri (Eds.), The Fragmented Mind, pp. 303–324. Oxford: OUP.
