Is It Possible to Empirically Test a Metatheory?
Foundations of Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09938-z
Knowledge and Disagreement
The Routledge Handbook of Disagreement, M. Baghramian, A. Carter, and R. Rowland (eds.), Routledge.
Kortabarria, M. (2024). Is it possible to do without the fundamental?, Philosophia, 52(2):1541-1560.
Kortabarria, M. & Giannotti, J. (2024). Scientific explanation as a guide to ground. Synthese, 203(3): 1-27.
La Artefactificación: Un nuevo problema para el Esencialismo Intencional de los Artefactos
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 80 (3): 943-978
La filosofía demoscópica ante la objeción de la capacidad experta
Patricia Hernando y Carlota G. Llorente (eds.), Actas del Congreso Internacional Linguistic Relativity and Experimental Philosophy, Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, pp. 46-53. ISBN: 978-84-09-58351-5.
Linguistic Hermeneutical Injustice
Social Epistemology, 39(4), 425–435, https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2024.2401143
Discussed in:
BIAP blog post
Kapusta’s reply in the Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Klieber’s reply in the Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
My own reply to Kapusta and Klieber in the Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Kapusta’s second reply in the Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Memory-based reference and immunity to error through misidentification
Synthese, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-024-04664-2
Mind in action: expanding the concept of affordance
37(7), 1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2365554
Motivational Internalism & Disinterestedness
British Journal of Aesthetics
Propuestas para caracterizar la noción de razonamiento convincente
Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación 4, pp. 20-32. DOI: 10.15366/ria2024.m4.002
Reliabilist Epistemology Meets Bounded Rationality
Synthese 203:115
Safety’s coordination problems
Philosophical Studies, forthcoming.
Somatosensation and the First Person
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 15: 51-68.
The Case for a Duty to Use Gender-Fair Language in Democratic Representation
Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 74, Issue 4, October 2024, Pages 1159–1181, https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqae041
The defectiveness of propaganda
The Philosophical Quarterly. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqae048
The Defectiveness of Propaganda
Philosophical Quarterly
The Epistemic Role of Vividness
Analysis
The Information-Processing Perspective on Categorization
Forthcoming in Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal
The Many Faces of the Liar Paradox
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 28: 15-21.
