Resumen

Background: During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), circuit coagulation is an important event that can result in suboptimal outcomes. Nurses must remain alert throughout the treatment and observe machine pressures. Transmembrane pressure (TMP) is commonly used for monitoring but it is sometimes too late to return blood to the patient. Aim: To compare the capacity of prefilter pressure (FP) versus TMP to predict the risk of circuit coagulation in adult patients with acute renal failure on CRRT. Study Design: An observational, longitudinal, prospective study. This study was carried out in a tertiary referral hospital over 2 years. Data collected included the following variables: TMP, filter or FP, effluent pressure, venous and arterial pressure, filtration fraction, and ultrafiltration constant of each circuit. Means and their trends over time were collected, for both diffusive and convective therapy and for two membrane types. Results: A total of 151 circuits (24 polysulfone and 127 acrylonitrile) were analysed, from 71 patients (n = 22 [34%] women; mean age, 66.5 [36–84] years). Of the total treatments, 80 were diffusive, and the rest were convective or mixed. In the diffusive circuits, a progressive rise in FP was observed without an increase in TMP and with an increasing trend in effluent pressure. Circuit lifespan was between 2 and 90 h. In 11% (n = 17) of the cases, the blood could not be returned to the patient. Conclusion: These findings allowed the creation of graphs that indicate the appropriate point to return blood to the patient. FP was a major determinant in this decision; in most cases, TMP was not a reliable parameter. Our findings are applicable to convective, diffusive, and mixed treatments as well as both types of membranes used in this acute setting.