Student Transitions and Access Itineraries in Masters’ Degrees in Spanish Universities: an Analysis of the Social Sciences Field

Captura

This study examines transition processes in access to masters’ degrees in the social sciences, with the participation of seven universities: six state, face-to-face universities (the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, the Universidad de Barcelona, the Universidad de La Laguna, the Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canarias, the Universidad de Sevilla and the Universidad de Zaragoza) from four different regions of Spain (Andalusia, Aragon, the Canary Islands and Catalonia), and the more specific case of the UNED, representing Spanish online universities.

Primera reunion i+d
First project meeting, MIDE Dept. - UB (2016)

This study examines transition processes in access to masters’ degrees in the social sciences, with the participation of seven universities: six state, face-to-face universities (the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, the Universidad de Barcelona, the Universidad de La Laguna, the Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canarias, the Universidad de Sevilla and the Universidad de Zaragoza) from four different regions of Spain (Andalusia, Aragon, the Canary Islands and Catalonia), and the more specific case of the UNED, representing Spanish online universities.

In the last decade we have witnessed a reorganization of university studies that has involved unprecedented growth in masters’ degrees aimed at professional development. The implementation of the EHEA throughout Spain has led to a new structure of university studies in the form of three new cycles. Since this took place the range of masters’ degrees on offer has widened substantially, and since 2008 enrolments have risen by 138% (MECD, 2015). These increases are especially important in some universities and degree subjects. The quantitative and qualitative weight of the master’s degree has also been confirmed on an international level (Hauschildt, Gwosć, Netz & Mishra, 2015).

Analyses of the characteristics of students enrolling on masters’ courses also corroborate a tendency towards the diversification of their social and educational backgrounds. Amongst the causes of this we would highlight: changes in employment and lifelong learning policies (Romero & Figuera, 2017); the achievement of equity in education, deriving from the social dimension (Egido Galvez, Fenández Diaz & Galán, 2014); and challenges stemming from the internationalisation of university systems (Rienties, Luchoomun & Tempelaar, 2014).

At the same time, the data reveal a rise in university drop-out rates, reaching 22.9% in Spain, with 15% in the first year. These figures vary according to types of university and degree subject (MECD, 2015). There are an additional two factors that, in our view, argue in favour of the social utility of the project presented here. First, there has been an increase in the cost of state university masters’ degrees, a factor that clearly impacts students’ itineraries. Second, the renewal of the official certification process of masters’ courses, recently implemented in this country, has made success and drop-out rates a measure of quality that universities are obliged to take into account.

These data show the important role that counselling and tutorial action can play; and indeed, the regulations (RD 1791/2010 of the University Students’ Statute) also back up such action. Developing such initiatives requires an in-depth knowledge of both students’ needs and the factors influencing their transition processes, and  though these, their personal and professional development. In the specific field of university counselling, this particular transition has emerged as a key construct linked to the main challenges of people’s professional development. The purpose of this study relates precisely to the challenge of understanding masters’ students’ transition processes in order to offer concrete recommendations for their support and guidance.

Objective 1

To ascertain the characteristics of master’s degree students and the differences among them according to  background and access itineraries

Objective 2

To analyse masters’ degree students’ academic transition processes

 

 

Objective 3

To understand students’ transitions to their masters’ degrees on the basis of their own perceptions and narratives

 

Objective 4

To design specific action plans to improve students’ transitions to masters’ degrees